Pseudoscience obviously
Pseudoscience is NOT science. You have to be able to test your scientific claims for it to be Science. If you can't it goes under the category of pseudoscience.
Maintaining the same condition is called stability. This means keeping something constant and unchanged over time.
In the scientific method, truth is sought through measurable evidence and defendable reasoning. Epistemology is concerned with how we acquire knowledge and the justification for believing something is true. By using empirical data and logical arguments, science aims to establish truth claims that are objective and verifiable.
It is called 'diplomacy'.
this is called botany
pseudoscience
pseudoscience you idiots
New Zealand claims part of the Antarctic territory, but does not 'run' any of it. The Antarctic Treaty preserves the continent for the study of science. Claims are unacknowledged.
There is something called the evolution of science.
The chance of something happening can be called a probability.
Ethics is something that has application to real life.
It is called probability that an event might happen on a scale from 0 to 1
Science is a continuous self correcting process in order to avoid possible mistakes or misunderstandings of the past. Instead of simply dubbing something a "fact" or not, science uses different levels of confidence in claims based on how well they hold up against evidence.
Something like planets or germs or a scientist do something you like about science!
Pseudoscience is NOT science. You have to be able to test your scientific claims for it to be Science. If you can't it goes under the category of pseudoscience.
There are some claims that the competitor for Goodnites, called "Underjams" are more discrete.
For something to be considered a science it has to have some sort of study or observance to explain something that has gone without definition. An example of something that is not a science is the ancient Egyptians. They were known to use poppy seed as a painkiller but that was it. They saw that it had effects and therefore utilized those effects. This did not meet the requirements of a science because they did not seek to explain WHY it was happening or how. That is the key ingredient in any science, to explain WHY or HOW something is doing what it is.