By most accounts, there is no such thing as an authoritarian democracy, since, by definition, democracies and authoritarian regimes are dichotomous.
authoritarian
Tha Tang's strength came from a system of equal land allotments to the male population. A tax on the allotments was the Tang's greatest source of income.The early Tang monarchs were good rulers overall. Rulers are not withing democracy goverments.
No Chad is not a democracy but dominant-party presidential republic.
It started as a monarchy, became an oligarchy, then a tyranny, then limited democracy, then an oligarchy, then a radical democracy, then a limited democracy.
The caudillos were leaders of an authoritarian tradition, whereby some citizens are above the law which is a pillar of democracy.
strict, dictatorial people have no say or freedom in how, government rules, opposite of democracy.
Yes. A representational democracy is a form of republic. "Democracy" means "rule by the people". "Republic" means "rule by elected officials". A representative democracy is both.
Authoritarianism and democracy are not fundamentally opposed to one another, it is thus definitely possible for democracies to possess strong authoritarian elements, for both feature a form of submission to authority.
Currently, Iraq is a Parliamentary Democracy that is slowly moving towards an Illiberal Democracy, but it is not a dictatorship. Under Saddam Hussein, Iraq was an Authoritarian State.
revolutionary and authoritarian regimes and resistance to european Imperialism, interanl political in european.;
Russia is considered to be an illiberal democracy or an authoritarian republic. This means that while there are elections for political leaders, they are more of a joke than a serious political contest between competing political perspectives.
Fascism meaning "A political theory advocating an authoritarian hierarchical government (as opposed to democracy or liberalism)". Does that answer your question?