Fallout 3 is a very good game...It has a bigger area and map to explore but has less challenges. Fallout 2 was a good game but not as much of action as Fallout 3 has. Actually, Fallout 2 could be defeated without even using an gun or more fighting other than the opening. To decide on which game is better is an matter of opinion. Fallout 3 is a lot more faster and has a different style of play. Fallout 2 is an turn based game and has more ways to play/win the game unlike the new Fallout 3, which depends on shooting too much. In the end, it is your decision that counts, not some self conceited opinion from another. <-----you spelled this wrong =^.^= ill get this let the grown ups talk.
dear lord this is someone else speaking not the guy who did the first answer 3 is a lot better then 2 better graphics better guns armor and its made by a better company (take it from the guy who can spell "another") FalloutFox
Note by Facesforce: I did originally spell various words incorrectly, which I have fixed now. More to the point, FalloutFox. You did not address the question at hand, which is crucial to updating WikiAwnsers. On top of this, you only presented your opinion, which was biased towards new-gene games. I originally changed the answer to show a more balanced point of view, in which some of the older fans of the fallout series can appreciate as well as the newer fans of the fps fallout. I only left your admission due to the fact it helps give the reader a more clear image of the type of conceited opinions that people may use to sway the readers to believe that the older fallout games. Also, I have taken liberty to correct your spelling errors. Have a wonderful day- Facesforce
it depends what you want in a game, my overall rating for fallout is a solid 9/10, borderlands is an 8/10. Fallout has a stronger storyline and more hidden objects, secrets, etc... but borderland has over 17750000 guns, while fallout has just about 100+ usable weapons.
But most of the guns on borderland are the same model just the lightest bit different.
I think fallout 3 is better depending on which one you buy if i was you i would pick game of the year addition there are a whole lot missions (or quest) to do and you dont die by radiation like the other one. and there are more weapons to get to. :)
no, it is probaly one of the best games out there
In my opinion Fallout 3 is better. New Vegas just doesn't create much of a post-apocalyptic feel.
Occasionally Fallout: New Vegas will freeze, but not as frequently as Fallout 3.
Fallout: New Vegas
In my opinion, Fallout 2.
Fallout New Vegas is the fifth installment in the Fallout series. It is for the Xbox 360, PS3, and the PC.
fallout: new vegas 2 I've heard.
Fallout new Vegas
No, you can't get married in Fallout: New vegas, but you can have sex in the game :)
Nothing in New Vegas spoils Fallout 3. They take place in 2 completely different corners of the country. And New Vegas can not spoil anything for Fallout 3, as New Vegas takes place before the events of Fallout 3. Hope this helps! Also Fallout 3 is not a sequal. But lets pray for a Fallout 4
fallout new Vegas will be on PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360
In my opinion Fallout New Vegas is. In Fallout NV it is easier to make caps so you can buy better wepons and ammo. In Fallout 3 It's hard to make a lot of caps in the begining making it a slow start. But is you want to test your skills play Fallout 3.
Fallout New Vegas is all one game.
There are no drivable vehicles in Fallout New Vegas, unless added by a mod.