It's all a matter of opinion, Metal Gear Solid 4 is more stealth and resident evil 5 is more of a shooter. If your just looking at ratings though, Metal Gear Solid 4 did much better.
personally metal gear solid 3: snake eater because it has that sense of freedom
Depends on your liking. Metal Gear Solid 3 is more recent, so it may have better graphics, but you may like 2's gaming style or story.
Metal Gear Solid. That's not even an opinion, it's just fact.
If you mean story wise then I believe it goes: Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater Metal Gear Metal Gear 2: Solid Snake Metal Gear Solid Metal Gear Solid 2 Metal Gear Solid 4 But I may be wrong, and that isn't counting either of the Portable Ops games.
metal gear solid1, metal gear solid 2 sons of liberty, metal gear solid 3 snake eater, and metal gear solid 4 guns of the patriots.
Metal Gear Solid, Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty and Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater
Very unlikely, but on PS3, there's a lot more fun Metal Gear Solid series;better than Metal Gear Solid:Peace Walker.
Meatal Gear Sold 3 Subsistence is alot better so get that one WRONG Snake Eater is alot Better in many differant ways.
Metal Gear Solid happened in 1998.
Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots
It depends each game is completely different but Metal gear was ahead of its time so i would have to go with metal gear
call of duty 2 pones metal gear solid by way theres online on call of duty its more realistic and better graphics and serriouslly nuclear bombs can kill a person in a snap so no graphics at all this why call of duty pones metal gear solid