The YOSCO - much better
That depends on what you are looking at. Reflectors are great for looking at galaxies close up and are usually cheaper. Refractors are better for seeing color in objects, however some brightness is lost as a result of the two-way mirror the light has to pass through.
Because probes can land on surfaces of planets and moons whereas a telescope can't.
If this telescope were at the poles during this occurrence, it would see better.
The telescope, invented by Galileo in the early 1600's, allowed us to see objects better that were far away. Galileo is credited with using his first telescope to discover Jupiter's moons, Saturn's rings, and the craters and other features of our moon.
Hi , A reflective scope uses mirrors to focus the image and the light while a refractive scope uses curved glass lenses to focus the light and the image. Generally the reflector telescope is better for deep sky viewing and the refractor is better for lunar and planetary viewing. You can also find a compound telescope which uses both glass and mirrors which is better for general viewing. This site very good for info and purchase http://www.tejraj.com/index.html Contact Me: http://notesonline.co.in/mail.asp
That depends on what you are looking at. Reflectors are great for looking at galaxies close up and are usually cheaper. Refractors are better for seeing color in objects, however some brightness is lost as a result of the two-way mirror the light has to pass through.
Better u ask who found that telescope
it can see further.
it should be the hubble space telescope because it can see 10 times better than a normal telescope
He looked through the telescope and was able to see Venus better.
You could make the telescope able to see better in the dark and make it more portable.
Because probes can land on surfaces of planets and moons whereas a telescope can't.
Because It Is Very High And If You Look Through A Telescope There You Can See It Better.
Since the Hubble Telescope is in space, it avoids interference from the atmosphere.
If this telescope were at the poles during this occurrence, it would see better.
Yes, light gathering power is proportional to the area of the objective. The more light a telescope can gather, the better the telescope will be able to allow the user to see.
To observe a very faint star a large telescope is better than a small one.