0
What is cultrual relativism and why is it important to social scientists?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
Cultural relativism is the idea that a person's beliefs, values, and practices should be understood based on that person's own culture rather than judged against the criteria of another. It is important to social scientists as it allows them to study and analyze diverse cultures without imposing their own cultural biases, leading to a more objective understanding of human behavior and society.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When is cultural relativism vulgar and how do anthropologists avoid this vulgar cultural relativism?
Cultural relativism becomes vulgar when it is used to justify harmful practices or oppress certain groups, ignoring basic human rights. Anthropologists avoid this by maintaining a critical stance towards cultural practices, taking into account broader social contexts and power dynamics. They seek to understand the complexities of different cultural beliefs and practices without condoning unethical behaviors.
Which is more an issue race or social class?
Both race and social class are significant issues that intersect to create complex systems of privilege and discrimination. They are interconnected and can impact individuals in various ways depending on their specific circumstances and context. It is important to address both race and social class inequalities to effectively combat systemic injustices.
What are humanity experts called?
Humanity experts are often referred to as sociologists, anthropologists, or social scientists. They study various aspects of human behavior, society, and culture to understand the complexities of the human experience.
Who believed that some types of culture were higher than others?
Cultural relativism asserts that no culture is inherently superior or inferior to another. However, some individuals and societies have held beliefs in cultural hierarchies, with ethnocentrism promoting the idea that one's own culture is superior to others. Specific historical figures like colonialists, imperialists, and proponents of social Darwinism have perpetuated these ideas.
Comparing what is learned in anthropology to current cultures is .?
Comparing what is learned in anthropology to current cultures allows for a deeper understanding of similarities and differences in social practices, beliefs, and norms. By applying anthropological concepts to contemporary societies, we can gain insights into the complexities of human behavior and cultural diversity. This comparative approach helps to challenge stereotypes, promote cultural relativism, and foster cross-cultural understanding.
What is the historical social and cultrual context of Paradise by coldplay?
this is a very hard question and im so sorry but i cant answer this question
Social or cultural relativism holds that what is right is whatever one's society or culture holds is right true or false?
True. Social or cultural relativism posits that what is considered right or wrong is determined by one's society or culture, meaning that ethical beliefs and practices can vary among different cultures and societies.
What are the 3 types of social scientists?
The three types of social scientists are historians, geographers, and archeologists.
Which kind of sample is most frequently used by social scientists?
Social scientists most often use a random sample
What is the social theory where each society determines how social action is understood?
i believe you are referring to cultural relativism, whereby different cultures have different norms and values, therefore it is hard to apply certain theories as universal
What position do social scientists take in the nature versus nurture debate?
It is the interaction between environmental factors and biological inheritance that is important in human development
Scientists who study patterns of health are called social?
Social Epidemiologist - APEX
What has the author William Mangin written?
William Mangin has written: 'It's all relative' -- subject(s): Cultural relativism, Ethnology, Indians of South America, Social conditions
What are the advantages and disadvantages of deviation from statistical norms?
It has 5 limitations: DNS may just be eccentricityCriminal Activity Cultural Relativism Social norms change over time Political control
Who are experts on racism?
Experts on racism include scholars specializing in critical race theory, sociologists studying race relations, psychologists researching biases and discrimination, and activists advocating for racial equality and social justice. These experts often have a deep understanding of systemic racism, its historical context, and its impact on marginalized groups.
What is the difference between a sociologist and a historian?
A sociologist studies human societies, social behavior, and interactions within groups, focusing on aspects like social structures, norms, and institutions. In contrast, a historian focuses on studying and interpreting past events, individuals, and societies through analyzing historical records, documents, and sources to understand how and why specific events occurred.
Relativism in morality ensures a progressive value system?
No. A distinction must be made between right and right. Correct, and Moral. Example: If your grandmother makes you cookies, and they taste horrible to you, and she asks if they taste wonderful to you. Correct answer: No, they taste horrible to me. Moral answer: ? Relativism is correct, but that doesn't mean it is moral. In fact, relativism is "amoral"- not immoral or moral. It has no moral opinions. It doesn't want people to do bad things, and it doesn't want people to do good things; because the nature of good and bad are opinions in the context of relativism. Relativism isn't about telling people what they "should" do. It implies no value system whatsoever. Whatever the consequences of relativism are, it remains the correct interpretation. Usually, though, we as human beings impose our own value systems upon society, and hold each other to them. These are social value systems. While social value systems are relative (to each society), within the society themselves they are as absolutes (though people may still disagree with them, and never be wrong, they will be held accountable by them). Sometimes those social values become so strong and wide-spread that people mistake them for universal, absolute values- that is is a factual mistake, and the interpretation is incorrect. Is this false interpretation moral? You decide. Relativism doesn't ensure anything, nor does absolutism. Absolutism, however, can be more dangerous when two absolutist-thinking societies come into contact and disagree on some key point of morality.
