A descriptive grammar tries to describe the actual structures and forms of a language. A prescriptive grammar is essentially a list of linguistic do's and don'ts.
Descriptive grammar records the errors people make without comment. Prescriptive grammar corrects the errors. Thus descriptive grammar records that many people sloppily say "It's me," while prescriptive grammar reminds us that well-spoken people properly say "It is I."
Descriptive grammar does not distinguish between correct and incorrect usage, whereas prescriptive grammar does make the distinction.
descriptive grammar
The prescriptive approach in linguistics used to be common until the 19th century. Linguists used to make rules for language and then considered the language which followed all of these rules properly the most perfect one. Prescriptive language is language which is described as it should be, not as it is really written and spoken. The opposite would be the descriptive approach, which observes language and recognizes the similarities instead of pre-fabricating rules. While the prescriptive approach classifies some languages as "of minor quality", all languages are equally "right" when analyzed descriptively.
Lines that are very descriptive
Sets standards of desirable practices for disclosure of compliance.
Characteristics of descriptive text include vivid imagery and strong descriptive elements. Descriptive text seeks to explain or describe something in great detail.
There is no difference. Neither exists. Grammar is grammar, period.
Descriptive grammar seeks to describe how language is actually used it the real world.
spelling
Descriptive theories study certain classes of subsets of the real line. Prescriptive theories compromise the description of a specific activity.
As a matter of prescriptive grammar, they are functionally the same. There is no reason why one is right or the other is wrong. As a matter of descriptive grammar, we can say that the phrase "If someone were to" is almost 5 times more common than the other one.
Do you believe the field of organizational behavior has the potential to become prescriptive as opposed to descriptive? Why or why not?
No, today's dictionaries are not purely descriptive. Many dictionaries include prescriptive elements, providing guidance on language usage and proper grammar in addition to defining words. Some dictionaries also aim to reflect changes in language over time while still maintaining certain prescriptive principles.
what is important of autonomy in nursing practice
The fundamental difference between UG and prescriptive grammar is that UG is discovered -- like anything in science. People attempt to find out what the rules are that are shared by all human languages. That's UG. Prescriptive grammar is imposed. It doesn't come from scientific investigation, it comes from random, often nonsensical declarations by self-appointed "experts". UG is discovered. Prescription is made up. That's the difference. That's why one belongs to the realm of science and the other doesn't.
The distinction is between prescriptive and descriptive grammarians, not linguists. The former point out errors. The latter call errors correct, if they are common enough.
descriptive grammar
A prescriptive approach to language focuses on dictating rules and norms for how language should be used based on traditional standards. An adescriptive approach views language as a dynamic system that evolves naturally, without prescribing any rules or judgments about correct usage.