pop the work is done with the help of functions and more previlage is given to function and not the data, also you dont have data hiding,operator overloading, function overloading, access specifiers and inheritance features in pop and when your business logic expanded pop was not able to meet the required demand and because of this oops came inot action where in oops data used to get more importance,data hiding is possible with the help of access specifiers. Each object controls it's own data, Inheritance is possible and many more features are available
Example of pop is :c,fortran
Example of oops is: java,C#
POP, or procedure oriented programming, is akin to spaghetti code, with unstructured statements and prevalent use of goto statements. There are no functions in POP, all code is effectively written as a single procedure which jumps back and forth, procedurally. POP is both difficult to read and difficult to maintain. Examples of POP include machine code and low-level assembler. There are few, if any, high-level POP languages these days.
Structured programming adds structure and order to POP, by eliminating the need for goto statements and introducing structured loops and procedure calls. C is an example of a structured programming language.
OOP, or object-oriented programming, is an extension to structured programming. While structured programming gave order to the chaos that was POP, the data was still largely exposed. Any code with access to the data could manipulate the data and, the more complex programs became, the more difficult it was to keep track of how data was being manipulated. OOP addresses this by allowing data and the methods that manipulate that data to be encapsulated into entities known as objects. The objects effectively hide the data from outside influence and expose a carefully controlled interface to that data. The interface allowed consumers of the objects to access and manipulate the data but in a highly controlled manner: each object takes care of its own data. Moreover, so long as the exposed interface remained the same, the underlying implementations of those interfaces could be modified without affecting the consumers of those objects. Objects could also be re-used to create more specialised objects, without the need to duplicate the code in the original objects, simply by inheriting the code, and overriding it where necessary. Polymorphism also allowed objects of different types to be treated as if they were the same type of object by exposing a common virtual interface that could be overridden by the more specialised objects. Thus every object "does the right thing" according to its type, even when that type may be completely unknown to the consumer. Finally, abstraction allows conceptual objects (such as shapes) to act as abstract interfaces to actual objects (such as circles and squares). C++ is an example of an object-oriented programming language.
it gives more important to data than procedures...
Oop starts with an o and pop starts with a p
The main features of OOP are the same regardless of the language. They are: encapsulation; data hiding; inheritance; and polymorphism.
pop push c++ programming
C++ evolved from C and therefore retains the concept of primitive variables inherited from C, including int and char. In 100% OOP languages such as Java, these primitives would be implemented as objects. But in C++, they are primitive in nature. That is, they have no built-in methods such as .ToString() associated with them.
solution of object oriented programming e balagurusamy
these are difference in between c and c++: a) C is a SPL and C++ is a OOP. b) C has not concept of object but C++ has this feature. c) C has not 'class' name data type but C++ has.
Primarily OOP support, but there are minor syntax difference. By and large anything you can do in C you can also do in C++.
C++ is based on C. C was not object oriented, therefore the language was not made to be object oriented and moreover C++ is not a "true OOP language". It is simply a non-OOP language with OOP functionality built onto it.
in pop a list of instruction telling a computer step by step what to do. same is the case in c++. eg.in case of every c++ program we first of all call the header files. in case of simple c++ program , after the header files we we use the function main, then there the initialization or declaration etc,. so in this way we tell the compiler step by step what to do. so we can say that c++ is a pop language. now let us consider a program of class, in this we declare the object and each object has its own method as is in oop. so we can say that c++ is both oop and pop..
Every languages are different, a C++ compiler cannot compile a Java source.
The concepts of OOP in C++ are the same as for OOP in any other programming language: abstraction, encapsulation, inheritance and polymorphism.
The main features of OOP are the same regardless of the language. They are: encapsulation; data hiding; inheritance; and polymorphism.
C++ is an OOP language, so the question does not make sense. Please restate the question.
pop push c++ programming
C++ is not 100% OOP because it inherits from C (a non-OOP language) and therefore supports all primitive C types which are strictly non-object-oriented. C# and Java are 100% object oriented as all "primitives" are object-based.
C++ evolved from C and therefore retains the concept of primitive variables inherited from C, including int and char. In 100% OOP languages such as Java, these primitives would be implemented as objects. But in C++, they are primitive in nature. That is, they have no built-in methods such as .ToString() associated with them.
solution of object oriented programming e balagurusamy
these are difference in between c and c++: a) C is a SPL and C++ is a OOP. b) C has not concept of object but C++ has this feature. c) C has not 'class' name data type but C++ has.