This theory tries to explain the double membranes belonging to mitochondria and chloroplasts. It suggests that both organelles once used to be single organisms, as in they were not mere parts of a cell.
Refer to the related link.
Lynn Margulis was the scientist who proposed and championed the endosymbiotic theory. She provided evidence to support the idea that eukaryotic cells evolved from symbiotic relationships between different prokaryotic organisms.
They arose from a symbiotic union of two organisms.
Yes, both mitochondria and chloroplasts are considered to be endosymbiotic organelles because they are believed to have evolved from free-living bacteria that were engulfed by ancestral eukaryotic cells. This symbiotic relationship enabled the host cell to obtain energy more efficiently through aerobic respiration (mitochondria) and photosynthesis (chloroplasts).
Photosynthetic bacteria has evolved. Symbiotic living has turned it into chloroplasts
Theory.
heilo centric theary
Refer to the related link.
Newton.
In the late 1800's ... but nobody believed it for 100 years.
They are origined from bacteria.They were evolved through endosymbiotic living.
Lynn Margulis was the scientist who proposed and championed the endosymbiotic theory. She provided evidence to support the idea that eukaryotic cells evolved from symbiotic relationships between different prokaryotic organisms.
This is the endosymbiotic theory.
They arose from a symbiotic union of two organisms.
Aerobic bacteria evolved into mitochondria.It is explained in endosymbiotic theory.
Both contain DNA
I bieleve it is the they compare animals by the texonimy theary.... Sorry if I got it wrong.... And sorry for not having many details...