Evolution is the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms.
It is a fact.
The evolution of financial management can be classified in to three stages: 1. Traditional Stage 2. Transitional Stage 3. Modern Stage
No Darwin's theory was not directly linked to classification .
He was one of the first to propose that all living things are related and he classified them in a nested hierarchy.
I don't exactly know why evolutionists refer to it as a theory, but I do know this. A theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning. According to the definition of a theory, evolution is not a theory. Evolution cannot be based on observation. No one was here to observe it. So evolution should be classified as a hypothesis not a theory. It is only a guess as to how things came about.
mew evovle into mewtwo if you somehow make a egg so it evoves into mewtwo if you get luckyActually, Mewtwo is NOT an evolution of Mew. Scientist created mewtwo out of DNA from mew, so it is classified as an "evolution". But you cannot take a Mew and evolve it.
Because he studied organisms very closely and propounded the theory of evolution with the phrase 'Struggle for existence and survival of the fittest organisms'.
There's a misconception at work here. The reptilian branch of evolution did not spawn the mammalian branch of evolution. You need to go back to the reptilian ancestor that was also a mammalian ancestor. We humans do have what is referred to as a reptilian brain, which is a small part of our whole brain.
The Renassiance was more of an evolution of culture, which was exceeding its highest form of art and music. The Protestant Reformation, however, was more of a revolution because it was a rebellion against the church's ways.
Biology classified organism by evolutionary link thus one with the closest common ancestor would put it near each other. Though one from a far ancestor might have more similar appearance than their relatives. It is just how evolution work.
The difference is one of scale and scope. This is best explained using a single species and its descendants as an example:Every change that happens to the species up to the point of speciation would be classified as "micro-evolution". But after speciation, divergence would not stop: the two new species would continue to diverge from one another, possibly resulting in yet more branching events, more new species. The scope would increase to include all of those as well. At this scale, we're talking about "macro-evolution". When we zoom in on one of those newly emerged species, we can see that the resulting "macro-evolution" is still being generated by the cumulative effects of "micro-evolution" within each individual population.
False. Relationships that that were not apparent to classifiers before the theory of evolution by natural selection was developed were brought into sharp relief by the theory. Mans place in nature, such as his close relationship with the great apes, could now be seen clearly.
Theory of evolution refers to animals and plants evolution along the time. Language evolution is another issue, not entirely related to the theory of evolution. It follows the theory of evolution on some way but it is related to culture evolution, not to the physical attributes evolution.