Direct examination is when the witness is FIRST questioned in court by an attorney (usually their own lawyer), when he is questioned by the opposing side it is called "cross-examination."
Direct examination is when the witness is FIRST questioned in court by an attorney (usually their own lawyer), when he is questioned by the opposing side it is called "cross-examination."
Examination of a witness by opposing counsel is called cross-examination, assuming that by "opposing counsel" you mean examining a witness that is testifying against the client of the opposing counsel. Examination by either counsel of witnesses in favor of their client's position is called direct examination.
The first examination of a witness is typically referred to as "direct examination." During this phase, the party that called the witness asks open-ended questions to elicit information that supports their case. The goal is to present the witness's testimony clearly and effectively, allowing the jury or judge to understand the facts relevant to the case. This examination is followed by cross-examination, where the opposing party can question the witness to challenge their credibility or the accuracy of their statements.
The attorney who calls the witness conducts a direct examination. The opposing attorney may then conduct a cross examination. The first attorney may then conduct a redirect exam, whereupon the opposing attorney may conduct a recross exam.
Trial lawyers can use cross-examination to impeach a witness's testimony, thereby undermining the credibility of that witness on that particular point or as part of a general assault on the witness's veracity. But, good cross-examiners will when appropriate use cross-examination to elicit facts favorable to his side from the witness. It is, therefore, not necessarily the best strategy to attack every witness. See, http://www.relentlessdefense.com/relentless-criminal-cross-examination.html
The witness was not prepared for the defense attorney's brutal cross examination.
the final round of questioning of a witness in a trial
A. create doubt @
A redirect examination is when an attorney asks additional questions to clarify issues raised during cross-examination. It allows the witness to explain or provide further details on points that were discussed earlier in the trial. The goal is to strengthen the witness's credibility and testimony.
direct examination, first
The final round of questioning of a witness in a trial
Trial lawyers can use cross-examination to impeach a witness's testimony, thereby undermining the credibility of that witness on that particular point or as part of a general assault on the witness's veracity. But, good cross-examiners will when appropriate use cross-examination to elicit facts favorable to his side from the witness. It is, therefore, not necessarily the best strategy to attack every witness. See, http://www.relentlessdefense.com/relentless-criminal-cross-examination.html