Examination of a witness by opposing counsel is called cross-examination, assuming that by "opposing counsel" you mean examining a witness that is testifying against the client of the opposing counsel. Examination by either counsel of witnesses in favor of their client's position is called direct examination.
Direct examination is when the witness is FIRST questioned in court by an attorney (usually their own lawyer), when he is questioned by the opposing side it is called "cross-examination."
Yes there are many Jehovah's Witnesses that are attorneys.
The attorney who calls the witness conducts a direct examination. The opposing attorney may then conduct a cross examination. The first attorney may then conduct a redirect exam, whereupon the opposing attorney may conduct a recross exam.
To introduce a witness in court, the attorney should first state the witness's name and their relationship to the case. The attorney should then ask the witness to take an oath to tell the truth. After that, the attorney can begin questioning the witness to elicit relevant information and testimony.
When an attorney determines that the opposing counsel (or witness) has made, or is about to make, a statement or revelation which is contrary to established law and/or legal procedure. The judge rules on the objection by saying either "sustained", which means he agrees with the attorney who made the objection, and the opposing council must drop that line of questioning, or he says "overruled" or "I will allow it", which means he disagrees - for the moment - with the attorney who made the objection, and the opposing council can continue.
When a witness is called to the stand in a trial - the replies he gives to the first round of questioning he undergoes is called his direct testimony. When the opposing attorney gets to ask him questions he is said to be cross-examining him. Then, if the cross-examination raised some new questions in the first attorney's mind he might question him a second time - this is known as giving re-direct testimony. Then - if the opposing attorney follows up with more of his own questions he is said to be re-cross-examining.
Direct examination is when the witness is FIRST questioned in court by an attorney (usually their own lawyer), when he is questioned by the opposing side it is called "cross-examination."
"Direct" examination is what you undergo on the witness stand when the attorney that subpoenaed you asks you questions. "Cross" examination is what you undergo when you are questioned by the attorney for the opposing side, in response to the questions you were previously asked on "direct." Any subsequent questioning of you on the stand would be termed "re-direct" examination" or "re-cross" examination.
During a trial, witnesses are typically questioned by the attorneys through a process called direct examination and cross-examination. The attorney who called the witness asks questions first (direct examination), followed by the opposing attorney who asks questions to challenge the witness's testimony (cross-examination). The judge may also allow redirect examination by the first attorney to clarify any points raised during cross-examination. The questions must be relevant to the case and follow the rules of evidence.
the final round of questioning of a witness in a trial
The non sequitur from the witness caught the attorney off guard, as it was an unrelated statement that disrupted the flow of the questioning. This unexpected response not only confused the attorney but also complicated the case, forcing them to regain composure and redirect the conversation. Such moments can undermine an attorney's strategy, highlighting the unpredictable nature of courtroom testimonies.
Direct examination is conducted by the attorney calling the witness. Most types of leading questions are not allowed during this round of questioning.