The following example says it all: Mexico has over 47% of its population (53 million in 2011) below the poverty line while at the same time, Carlos Slim, the richest man in the world and of Mexican origin, has a fortune worth US$69 billion.
The spatial inequality in Mexico is very big, to where in some areas, are nice, big, expensive homes, and right across the street are people living in cardboard homes.
Mariano Bosch has written: 'Minimum wages and earnings inequality in urban Mexico'
Poverty, corruption, and a considerable inequality in the distribution of income are among the most important outcomes.
Substitute the values of the variables into the inequality. If the inequality is true then they are a solution, if not, they are not.Substitute the values of the variables into the inequality. If the inequality is true then they are a solution, if not, they are not.Substitute the values of the variables into the inequality. If the inequality is true then they are a solution, if not, they are not.Substitute the values of the variables into the inequality. If the inequality is true then they are a solution, if not, they are not.
"x281" is an expression, not an inequality. An inequality is supposed to have an inequality sign, such as "<" or ">".
There is no inequality since there is no inequality sign.
algebraic inequality, is an inequality that contains at least one variable.
The inequality is maintained with the direction of the inequality unchanged.
Inequality is a noun.
There is no inequality in the question.
Brazil has a higher GDP than Mexico, but Mexico has a higher GDP per capita than Brazil, which is what matters. Mexico also has a lower inequality index than Brazil. But Argentina has better stats than Mexico or Brazil. For more info look up "GDP per capita by country" and "Gini index by country" in Wikipedia
-4