It is considered an ionic bond because copper is a metal and bromine is a nonmetal. However, with an electronegativity difference of less than 1.0, the compound will have some covalent character.
Pauling electronegativity 2.33 Sanderson electronegativity 2.29 Allred Rochow electronegativity 1.55 Mulliken-Jaffe electronegativity 2.41 (sp3 orbital) Allen electronegativity no data
electronegativity
You think probable to electronegativity.
The electronegativity of Uranium is 1,3.
Francium is the element with the highest electronegativity.
Francium has the highest Pauling electronegativity: 0,7.
Copper is used because of its higher conductivity. Although silver has more conductivity then copper but it is not used because of its cost, however silver is used in some specialized equipments such as satellites. Copper or any other metals conductivity properties is based on its electronegativity. Generally, all metals must have low electronegativity and ionization energies. But all metals do not have the same electronegativity levels.
Copper's conductivity properties are based on its electronegativity. Generally, all metals must have low electronegativity and ionization energies. But all metals do not have the same electronegativity levels.
Copper is one of the best electrical conductors because it has very low electronegativity and ionization energies which are in play to facilitate electrical conductivity.
Sulfur has relatively high electronegativity and is also a poor conductor of electricity at room temperature. Fluorine has the highest electronegativity and copper is a good conductor of electricity.
Here is a line up I extracted: note that ti is BELOW iron: maybe someone who is a chemist can explain why this is the case? In any case, the results that I obtained follow: elt symbol electronegativity gold au 2.4 copper cu 1.9 iron fe 1.83 lead pb 1.8 aluminum al 1.61 TITANIUM ti 1.54 sodium na 0.93 from physlink.com
It is considered an ionic bond because copper is a metal and bromine is a nonmetal. However, with an electronegativity difference of less than 1.0, the compound will have some covalent character.
Iron is more strongly metallic, or in more precise terms, has a lower electronegativity, than copper, therefore the sulphate radical has a stronger affinity for iron than for copper. Given the chance, therefore, iron will replace copper in CuSO4 forming FeSO4, and the copper will then precipitate from solution.
Electronegativity
Pauling electronegativity 2.33 Sanderson electronegativity 2.29 Allred Rochow electronegativity 1.55 Mulliken-Jaffe electronegativity 2.41 (sp3 orbital) Allen electronegativity no data
electronegativity