A non vascular tissue's cell doesn't contain any water food etc.. and it doesn't have any tube to grow more than a vascular plant.
A vascular plant that does not have tissue
vans of the wall
Nonvascular plants such as liverworts and mosses don't have this kind of tissue. Without lignified vascular tissue, this liverwort cannot transport nutrients or water from its rhizoids to other cells that are more than a few millimeters away.
Yes. Conifers are vascular. If a plant has spores, its nonvascular.
Non vascular is term used for plants and not for fungi, any how fungi lack vascular tissue .
Nonvascular - don't have tissue to carry food and water to the rest of the plant i.e mosses vascular - have tissue that carry water and food i.e redwood tree
No, they have roots and stems and vascular tissue
nonvascular
vans of the wall
Nonvascular plants such as liverworts and mosses don't have this kind of tissue. Without lignified vascular tissue, this liverwort cannot transport nutrients or water from its rhizoids to other cells that are more than a few millimeters away.
tissue
ricca and marchantia are two plants without tubes they are also non-vascular
Yes. Conifers are vascular. If a plant has spores, its nonvascular.
Nonvascular
nonvascular organisms are organisms without vascular tissue: e.g. algae, lichens, fungi, mosses
Because they do not have any tissue for carrying materials throughout the plant
Non vascular is term used for plants and not for fungi, any how fungi lack vascular tissue .
Nonvascular - don't have tissue to carry food and water to the rest of the plant i.e mosses vascular - have tissue that carry water and food i.e redwood tree