answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

supreme court can declare a law unconstitutional

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is one decision made in the Malboro vs Madison case?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What case made the Supreme Court an equal branch?

Marbury vs. Madison


Is there usually any way to appeal a decision made by the housing authority?

There is normally an appeals process for any decision made by a govenment agencey. You will need to speak with your case worker to find out the procedure for your case.


What case's are not affected by a jury?

The ones where you plead guilty or a decision is made by a judge.


What is the decision made by a court that first hears the case?

original jurisdiction. Verdict.


What was the judges decision in the Dred Scott Case?

it made slavery and the western territory


Can a plaintiff drop a tort in a civil case?

If a judge has not made a decision, the plaintiff and their attorney can drop, or settle, the tort. However, once a judge has made a decision, the judge's decision is upheld by law, and the plaintiff has no say.


Case law refers to?

Case law refers to common law. It is a law that is made by judges through the decision of the court.


Was Gibbons v Ogden the only case in Supreme Court history that went without a decision?

The US Supreme Court made a decision in the case of Gibbons v. Ogden, (1824). See Related Questions, below, for a discussion of that decision.


What does case adjudicated mean in a felony case?

In plain English it means that the final verdict or judgment has been rendered.


What is a disposition narrative?

A disposition narrative is a written report or document that outlines the final decision made by a judge or court in a legal case. It summarizes the details of the case, the evidence presented, and the reasoning behind the judge's decision.


Why was the decision in Marbury v. Madison constitutionally important?

Marbury v. Madison, (1803) illustrates how the power of the Supreme Court, or the Federal Courts, depends not only on its constitutional authority, but on how the Constitution is interpreted, how the judicial branch avoids a confrontation with the other branches of government, and how the members of the court go about making a decision. The decision in the case established the right of judicial review for the federal courts. John Marshall, and the other members supporting his decision, ruled that the Supreme Court had no power to issue writs to compel public officials to do their duty, in this case awarding an appointment made by President Adams, because the Judicial Act of 1789 giving the court that power was unconstitutional. Marshall pointed out that the Constitution of the United States, Article III, pointed out precisely the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction, and it did not mention issuing writs of the sort in this case. The result of the case was that a showdown with the Jeffersonians was avoided, one that the court might lose, and the power of the Supreme Court was clarified and increased.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What does it mean when a judge issues an ex parte decision?

An "ex parte" decision is made by a judge when only one, or neither, of the parties involved in a case are present. In the US both parties must be able to state their case, so the "ex parte" decision can only be temporary.