answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is one difference between the way terrestrial plants and Jovian plants formed?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the primary difference in composition between the Sun and the terrestrial planets is?

Dependant on how the debris from supernovae is moving, the proportions of certain materials present, and the initial conditions of solar systems forming different combinations of terrestrial and Jovian planets are formed. Terrestrial planets are comprised of heavier particles (ie. of higher relative atomic mass) meaning they have stronger gravity which leads to higher density planets than the gaseous Jovian planets. A Jovian planet can be thought of as a failed star - it has all the elements needed to fuel nuclear fusion, but not enough gravity to attain the nuclear activation energy required. So the Sun started as a large cloud mostly comprising of gases, and terrestrial planets were formed from clouds mostly consisting of heavy solids.


What are the differences between the way terrestrial and jovian planet formation?

Terrestrial planets were formed by:the collapse of the solar nebulathe condensation of grainsthe growth of planetesimalsthe clearing of debrisJovian planets were formed by:the collapse of the solar nebulathe condensation of grainsthe growth of planetesimalsthe capturing of gasthe clearing of debris


Why are Terrestrial planets closer to the sun then the Jovian planets?

Terrestrial planets are made of denser materials than Jovian planets. The planets were primarily formed from the left over disc of dust that orbited our sun when it first formed. The heavier elements were draw closer to the sun by gravity and the lighter ones flung further outward by their high orbital speed.


What type of solar system objects would be formed inside the rock metal condensation line?

Probably not a Jovian planet, but the Terrestrial planets would form.


Why don't terrestrial planets have rings like the Jovian planets?

While the terrestrial planets are mostly rocky with metallic cores, the Jovian planets are huge balls of gas. The Jovian Planets are also much larger than the terrestrial ones.


How does the solar nebula theory explain the dramatic density difference between the terrestrial and jovian planets?

The solar nebula theory explains that planets are formed by solid bits of matter. What that matter is entirely dependent on the gas and substances available. The terrestrial planets in our solar system were located in the inner part of the solar nebula. This means that the temperatures were too high for the gas to condense into solids, leaving metals and silicates as the only solids from which the small and dense terrestrial planets could form. Meanwhile, the temperatures in the outer solar nebula were cold enough for the gases to form solid ice. The large Jovian planets then formed from the large amounts of ice particles available and were able to capture gas directly from the solar nebula because of how large they were. The solar nebula theory explains that planets are formed by solid bits of matter. What that matter is entirely dependent on the gas and substances available. The terrestrial planets in our solar system were located in the inner part of the solar nebula. This means that the temperatures were too high for the gas to condense into solids, leaving metals and silicates as the only solids from which the small and dense terrestrial planets could form. Meanwhile, the temperatures in the outer solar nebula were cold enough for the gases to form solid ice. The large Jovian planets then formed from the large amounts of ice particles available and were able to capture gas directly from the solar nebula because of how large they were.


Which is not a Jovian planet?

Pluto is the only "planet" that isn't a planet. Well I think that the IAU still have not answered the question WHAT MAKES A PLANET A PLANET? Is it a certain size or something? Comment : The IAU have defined a planet. The definition is mainly about size, but it's not simple: 1) The object must be big enough for gravity to have formed it into a (roughly) spherical shape. 2) The object must be by far the largest object in the neighbourhood of its orbit. Pluto qualifies on 1) but fails on 2). Also, Venus and Mercury are sometimes called "morning stars" or "evening stars", but they are planets.


What is the difference between the states formed by the First Civilizations and the empires formed between 500 BC and 500 CE?

3


What is the relationship between bonds and electronegativity?

If the electronegativity difference between the two atoms is above 1.7, then ionic bond is formed and if the difference is below 1.7, then covalent bond is formed.


The origins of the mineral sample were?

The origins of most mineral samples were terrestrial. This means that they were naturally formed on Earth, and were not extra-terrestrial.


What is the difference between metaporphic and igneos rock?

The difference between metaporphic and ignous rock are that ignous rock is formed by cooling of magma and metaporphic is formed by temperature and pressure changes inside the earth


What is the definition of gravitational instability theory?

Is a theory that the jovian planets are formed directly form the instabilities within the gases.