To make a sentence shorter so it doesn't seem to take forever to end.
"He's in the room."
"He is in the room."
None. There should be no apostrophe in one of its kind because its is a possessive pronoun.
2 main reasons to use apostrophe:1. for contractionsExamples:you will : you'llthere is: there'syou are: you're2. to show ownershipExamples:Ann's stylesKev's tactics
As a plural, for more than one dad; no, does not need an apostrophe. As a possessive, as in the item belonging to dad, then yes, it does need an apostrophe.
There isn't one.
It is an apostrophe, and one example of use is: you're for you are.
As county's (if one wishes to indicate possesion). eg Lancaster was originally the county's administrative headquarters or county town. There is no other reason to use an apostrophe.
the apostrophe of you had is 'you'd' the reason however that you use that's, is because it is two words put together, and in this case it's 'that is.'
None. There should be no apostrophe in one of its kind because its is a possessive pronoun.
2 main reasons to use apostrophe:1. for contractionsExamples:you will : you'llthere is: there'syou are: you're2. to show ownershipExamples:Ann's stylesKev's tactics
won'tAdditional answerIt's not true to say that won't is in an apostrophe. Apostrophe is the little comma that goes into words where one or more letters have been omitted and won't is the contracted form of will not.^I think they know what an apostrophe is! They were asking what 'will not' was when it was shortened with an apostrophe.
You don't have an apostrophe in your sentence. You don't need one either.
Apostrophe has only one name. It's apostrophe. The plural is apostrophes.
No, the word "that" does not require an apostrophe to show possession. The possessive form of "that" is simply "that's."
No. One's = one is.
As a plural, for more than one dad; no, does not need an apostrophe. As a possessive, as in the item belonging to dad, then yes, it does need an apostrophe.
There isn't one.
it is called an apostrophe.