The Gaia hypothesis treats the Earth as a self-regulating organism where the biotic and abiotic components interact to maintain conditions suitable for life. It proposes that the Earth functions as a single, self-regulating system that helps to keep the planet in homeostasis.
Vestigial structures are considered evidence, but no more critical than any other line of evidence in Biology and palaeontology. They're considered evidence, not because of their function, but because of the way their morphologies follow the nested hierarchies of biology: the vestigial legs of whales, for instance, have exactly the kind of shape we would have expected them to have if whales had descended from land mammals. The same goes for human tailbones and embryonic branchial ridges, the wings of emus, and so on.
This is an example of indirect observation - you are not seeing the animals directly but are viewing evidence of their existence.
There is no scientific evidence to support the idea that a dog's spirit can transfer into another dog. It is a belief found in some spiritual and cultural traditions, but it is not based on empirical evidence.
AnswerThe fossil record is the primary source of evidence of past life forms.The fossil record is also an important source of evidence of evolution. However, Charles Darwin was able to develop his Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection largely without reference to fossil evidence. He saw evidence for evolution in present life forms. Another source of evidence for evolution is to be found in DNA.
Major rivers on different continents match
Fossil evidence showing similar plant and animal species in regions that are now widely separated provides support for Wegner's hypothesis of continental drift. This suggests that the continents were once connected in a single landmass.
Well...it all depends on the hypothesis. For example, if you know exactly how to back it up with evidence, than very easy. But...if your hypothesis is kind of 'far out', and finding evidence will be difficult, then writing it will be hard.
Fossil evidence supporting Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift included identical fossils found on separate continents, showing that these landmasses were once connected. This supported the idea that continents had drifted apart over time. Additionally, the presence of ancient glacial deposits in regions that are now too warm for glaciers to form suggested that these areas were once located closer to the South Pole.
experimental evidence that supports the new idea
Yes, it doesnt matterwhat kind of evidence there is, as long as it supports your case.
A result which is consistent with a hypothesis adds weight to the evidence in favour of that hypothesis: it makes it more likely that the hypothesis is true. But you can never ever confirm a scientific hypothesis. The best that you can do is to show that an alternative hypothesis is unlikely. There could be another hypothesis which is better than the one you started with as well as the alternative that you compared it with: but you simply do not know.
A problem is a situation that presents difficulty or challenge, while a hypothesis is a proposed explanation or prediction based on limited evidence. Problems require solving and can lead to the formulation of hypotheses as part of the problem-solving process.
This is a "proof by contradiction", where the evidence would fail to support the reverse assumption, giving credence to the original hypothesis.
A hypothesis is a statement that proposes a relationship between two or more variables and is based on prior scientific research or observation. It is testable through experimentation and observation to determine if there is evidence to support or reject the proposed relationship. The results of these tests can help researchers draw conclusions about the validity of the hypothesis.
The evidence from the fossil record is considered the strongest support for other forms of evidence in evolution. Fossils provide a physical record of past organisms, showing changes over time and the relationships between different species. This evidence complements genetic, anatomical, and embryological evidence to provide a comprehensive understanding of evolutionary processes.
scientists use scientific method as a tool to answer their questions or hypothesis.