Want this question answered?
As a kind of living organism
This is an example of indirect observation - you are not seeing the animals directly but are viewing evidence of their existence.
Vestigial structures are considered evidence, but no more critical than any other line of evidence in Biology and palaeontology. They're considered evidence, not because of their function, but because of the way their morphologies follow the nested hierarchies of biology: the vestigial legs of whales, for instance, have exactly the kind of shape we would have expected them to have if whales had descended from land mammals. The same goes for human tailbones and embryonic branchial ridges, the wings of emus, and so on.
AnswerThe fossil record is the primary source of evidence of past life forms.The fossil record is also an important source of evidence of evolution. However, Charles Darwin was able to develop his Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection largely without reference to fossil evidence. He saw evidence for evolution in present life forms. Another source of evidence for evolution is to be found in DNA.
Microfossils are important to geologists because they are the evidence we have to what past life looked like. Any kind of fossil can give us clues to what kind of living organisms inhabited the area millions of years ago.
Because Katie beaver said so bitchhh
major rivers on different continents match
Major rivers on different continents match
Molecular Genetics
Well...it all depends on the hypothesis. For example, if you know exactly how to back it up with evidence, than very easy. But...if your hypothesis is kind of 'far out', and finding evidence will be difficult, then writing it will be hard.
experimental evidence that supports the new idea
Yes, it doesnt matterwhat kind of evidence there is, as long as it supports your case.
A result which is consistent with a hypothesis adds weight to the evidence in favour of that hypothesis: it makes it more likely that the hypothesis is true. But you can never ever confirm a scientific hypothesis. The best that you can do is to show that an alternative hypothesis is unlikely. There could be another hypothesis which is better than the one you started with as well as the alternative that you compared it with: but you simply do not know.
This is a "proof by contradiction", where the evidence would fail to support the reverse assumption, giving credence to the original hypothesis.
A problem is a kind of question. A hypothesis is a kind of estimate of how something works or why it doesn't work, or is, or is not, or might eventually be.
the 3 kinds of hypothesis are: 1. alternative: this is the hypothesis that is affirmative, positive, and approving..... this gives a positive possible result of the experiment. 2. null: this is a negative hypothesis about the experiment........ 3. cause and effect: this kind of hypothesis gives a cause and effect hypothesis.... this has the "if & then" clause...... (example: "if sunlight affects the growth of plants, then it might slow down or fasten the plant's growth.")
A non-directional research hypothesis is a kind of hypothesis that is used in testing statistical significance. It states that there is no difference between variables.