the decision about what to include and exclude.
biased :) <3 Apex Answered by the Jarizzle :)
Unintentional bias means the source of the bias is in the data collection or sampling method. Its not done purposefully, but rather ignorantly.
Various FET biasing circuits are as follows: 1. Fixed bias 2. Self bias 3. Potential divider bias 4. Current-Source bias
The two sources add together, imposing a DC bias to the AC source.
How could you tell if the a Historical source is tainted with bias of a specitic agenda?
When analyzing a source
biased :) <3 Apex Answered by the Jarizzle :)
Unintentional bias means the source of the bias is in the data collection or sampling method. Its not done purposefully, but rather ignorantly.
Yes, a primary source can be biased because it reflects the perspective or agenda of the individual who created it. It's important to consider the potential biases of a primary source when analyzing and interpreting its information.
Hehrh
Historians would be wise to look for bias in a source because bias can influence the way the writer relayed the information. Sources free from bias are to be the most trusted.
bias
If a source is biased, it provides information which is slanted one way or another. It isn't a credible source because it isn't presenting the facts in a straight-forward manner.
Various FET biasing circuits are as follows: 1. Fixed bias 2. Self bias 3. Potential divider bias 4. Current-Source bias
Some Bias
What? Bias is a one sided opinion