0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the opposite of pejoration?
The opposite of pejoration (worsening) would be amelioration (building, strengthening).
Is the word surly amelioration or pejoration?
To ameliorate is to improve. To pejorate is to worsen. So in this case, you would have to look at whether the connotative meaning of the word "doom" has worsened or gotten better. My best guess is that it has probably worsened, so it would be pejoration.
How do you use pejorative in a sentence?
It is not wise to be pejorative all the time, but it is better to be benign.
What are examples of pejoration?
Words often change their meanings over time. When a word's definition becomes more negative, that is called pejoration. Some examples are:Silly - Originally meant "blessed; fortunate." Now means, "foolish; nonsensical; stupid."Villain - originally meant "farmhand" (living in a villa i.e. country house.) Then it came to mean "low-born; low-class." Now it means "evil-doer; bad-guy."Profane - originally a neutral word meaning "anything outside the building of a church." (for example, praying in your house would have been "profane."). Now it means "sinful, evil."Pagan - originally meant "someone who lived in the country." Now it means "someone who doesn't believe in God; savage; barbarous." (The same change in meaning happened to the word "heathen.")Doom - originally meant "judgment; determination." Now it means "impending catastrophe; death; destruction." (The original meaning of doom is still retained in the words "freedom" and "wisdom" meaning "judged to be free" and "judged to be wise.")Fatal - originally meant "caused by fate/destiny." Now it means "causing death; lethal."The opposite process of pejoration is amelioration. Under amelioration, a word's definition becomes more positive over time. This is much less common (in English at least). One example:Nice - originally meant "foolish." Now it means "kind." (Of course, equating kindness with foolishness might be - in some people's opinions - a form of pejoration itself.)
The word kindergarten originates from?
A Kind of HistoryWhen someone uses the word "origin," "property," or "birth," they are referring to something specifically, but many years ago one word could have meant any or all of these things. With origins from the word "kin," initially spelled gecynde, or gakundi, the word "kind" has been used in written texts as a noun or adjective in some variation or spelling since around the end of the ninth century (Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd ed. 436). Over the last 1,200 years, the word "kind" has lost many of its meanings; though all of its meanings have had something to do with either the origins of a person or thing. For example, "kind" could have been used to mean the property belonging to someone by birth, a person's character, gender, family, or natural state (436). Most of these definitions have not been used for the last few hundred years, and only in the last two hundred years have the original meanings become the few we know today. The initial definitions have not been lost or erased, but only integrated with the contemporary usage of the word.A brief history of the word "kin" must be explained before the history of "kind" because "kind" originates from "kin." In Old English, the genitive form of "kin" could have been written cynnes, cynne, and cynna depending on number and gender, but later became kunne, kynne, kyn, and kin (OED 434). Whether or not the word was spelled starting with a "c" or a "k" seems to have been arbitrary because as early as 897 the word was spelled "kynn," but then in 1000 spelled "cyn" (434). It is also interesting to note that specifically in southern England, the word "kin" comes from the plural form of the word "cow," which in Old English was written "kýn" (1080). In a sense, this definition is retained when "kin" becomes "kind," except that instead of specifically meaning "cows," it means "property belonging to one by birth." "Kin" and "kind" were apparently interchangeable until the form of the word "kynne" was reduced with the help of the borrowed Old French word "manere," which meant "manner." Manere did not directly affect the word kin, but promoted the use of "kind" (435):"The reduction of kin to its simple uninflected form may have been assisted by the equivalent use of menere (manner) from OFr.. which is thus found, as threo maer men = men of three kinds or sorts. In this, at an early period, we find of inserted: an manere of fisce, al maner o suet spices, the syntactical relation between the words being thus reversed, and although this appears to have rarely extended to kin itself, it affected its later representative kind… so that we now say 'all kinds of things'" (OED, 435)After "kind" replaced "kin," it did not take long for people to use "kind" in any way they could. This is evident in the fact that by the end of the ninth century, when looking at five different texts, "kind" is used in five different ways. All five definitions, though sometimes abstractly, had to do with things acquired by birth. Depending on the context, the word "gecynd(e)" could be used to mean property belonging to one by birth, the quality of someone derived from birth, the established order of things, "a natural quality, property or characteristic," or race of an animal or plant (OED 436). The connection between these definitions and "kin" is apparent because family is something that "belongs" to one by birth. The quality of a person is derived from the influence of their family, and a family is an "established order" of people. The species to which someone, or thing belongs is in a sense their family, or kind.If one were to say in the twelfth century, "that is not my kind," depending on the context, it might be difficult to understand exactly what the speaker meant. Probably for this reason people started modifying the word "kind." "1200: Hie giuen here elmesse noht for godes luue, ac for neheboredon oðer for kinraden" (OED 441). Instead of saying, "the kind of man," or, "the family kind," "kind" was compounded as either a prefix or suffix to form words such as "kindness," "kindom," "kindred," and "mankind." Similar to the uses of "kin" and "kind," which both meant "family," before "mankind" was "mankin;" though "mankind" superseded "mankin" gradually in the fourteenth century (441). The use of the word "kind" as a prefix in "kindred" may have formed in parallel to the word "kynde," but "the modern kindred, which first became common in the 17th century, appears to have arisen through [the] phonetic development of d between n and r, as in thunder" (441).In roughly the next century, given the fluid nature of the word the word, "kind" gained many new meanings, though a few of them seem to be specifications of the old ones. For example, during the year 1000 the word "kind" was used to mean "the way natural or proper to anyone," which probably comes from the definition used in 888: "the character or quality derived from birth"[1] (OED, 436). It is also important to note that the words "birth, origin and descent" were meant by "kind" because this lead the way to many things having to do with birth. In 1000, "kind" was used to mean birth, natural form or condition, gender, manner, offspring or kindred, a class of people or objects, and rarely sexual organs (437). After "kind" was used for "family," more definitions concerning the family were made. In the 1400's, "kind" could be used to mean family, descent, ancestral race from which one descends, a generation (rarely), type, in order or good condition, and out of order, or bad condition. The definition concerning good, or bad follows a logical path because for one to be treated as though they are "in the family" is "in kind" and "outside of the family," or "out of kind."; as an example, from Lanfranc's Cirurg in 1400, "Of a wounde bollid and out of kynde" (436). By 1500, certain usages appear to have been condensed, or fell out of use altogether. In written texts at least, "kind" stopped being used to refer to someone's sexual organs, their generation, their natural state or quality, and their genealogy. From 1600 onward, "kind" has kept its current meaning, except for a strange usage in the mid 1800's until the very early 1900's, where it was used to mean "the worst kind, or very badly;" however, this usage is only limited colloquially to the United States (437). As an example from an 1877 text, "I licked him the worst kind" (437). As can be seen by the end of the nineteenth century, people are no longer spelling the word "gecynde."By looking at bits of text containing variations of the word "kind" over the last 1,200 years, it is clear that the changes in spelling took place gradually. The spellings "gecynde" and "gecynd" were consistently used in Old English until around the twelfth century when the "ge" was dropped and the word was spelled icunde, ikunde, cynd, cunde, suinde, kuinde, kynde, kunde, kende, kynd, kinde, and kind (OED, 436). The cy spelling is used less frequently from the eleventh century until the thirteenth century, where it is not used at all. Instead, "cy" was replaced with "cu", or "icu", as in the words "cund, cunde, or icunde." Any variation of the word with the first letter as "c" stops by the fourteenth century. The current spelling of the word "kind" appears as early as 1300, though it is not consistent because the "e," or "es" ending does not go away until the late sixteenth century. The "y" in "kynd" falls out of usage somewhere in the early 1600's and from that point on, the word has been spelled "kind."With a few exceptions, the word "kind" has generally meant the same thing for well over a thousand years, and the definitions which did not fit the trend fell out of use. When someone says, "that was very kind of you," what they mean is, "you are treating me like we were born of the same family." However, as in the 1800s where "kind" was used in a negative connotation, perhaps "kind" will undergo pejoration, which is a semantic change from a positive usage to a negative. In a thesaurus from the year 2080, "conniving" might be synonymous with "kind."Works Cited"Cow." The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Page 1080. Print"Kin." The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Pages 434-435. Print"Kind." The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Pages 436-438. Print"Kindred." The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Pages 441-442. Print"Mankind." The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Page 321. Print[1]
What is the opposite of pejoration?
The opposite of pejoration (worsening) would be amelioration (building, strengthening).
A word that loses respectability undergoes what?
Pejoration
Is the word surly an amelioration?
No, the word "surly" is not an amelioration. It typically has a negative connotation, meaning bad-tempered or unfriendly. An amelioration is a process where a word's meaning evolves to become more positive over time.
What is cavalier a pejoration or an amelioration?
Ameliorate
Has weed and stink undergone specialization generalization amelioration or pejoration.?
it is generalization..
The process of a word gaining a negative meaning means?
The process of a word gaining a negative meaning is called pejoration. This typically happens when a word's original neutral or positive connotation shifts over time due to cultural, social, or linguistic changes. The evolution of language and usage patterns can contribute to this shift in a word's meaning.
Is the word surly amelioration or pejoration?
To ameliorate is to improve. To pejorate is to worsen. So in this case, you would have to look at whether the connotative meaning of the word "doom" has worsened or gotten better. My best guess is that it has probably worsened, so it would be pejoration.
How do you use pejorative in a sentence?
It is not wise to be pejorative all the time, but it is better to be benign.
What are examples of pejoration?
Words often change their meanings over time. When a word's definition becomes more negative, that is called pejoration. Some examples are:Silly - Originally meant "blessed; fortunate." Now means, "foolish; nonsensical; stupid."Villain - originally meant "farmhand" (living in a villa i.e. country house.) Then it came to mean "low-born; low-class." Now it means "evil-doer; bad-guy."Profane - originally a neutral word meaning "anything outside the building of a church." (for example, praying in your house would have been "profane."). Now it means "sinful, evil."Pagan - originally meant "someone who lived in the country." Now it means "someone who doesn't believe in God; savage; barbarous." (The same change in meaning happened to the word "heathen.")Doom - originally meant "judgment; determination." Now it means "impending catastrophe; death; destruction." (The original meaning of doom is still retained in the words "freedom" and "wisdom" meaning "judged to be free" and "judged to be wise.")Fatal - originally meant "caused by fate/destiny." Now it means "causing death; lethal."The opposite process of pejoration is amelioration. Under amelioration, a word's definition becomes more positive over time. This is much less common (in English at least). One example:Nice - originally meant "foolish." Now it means "kind." (Of course, equating kindness with foolishness might be - in some people's opinions - a form of pejoration itself.)
Is Yahweh's name forbidden to be spoken?
Ouch! Tough question! Well, Yahweh is God's name and God said not to use his name is vein which means not swearing. If you used inappropriately, then yes, you should not say it. But God wants us to call out to him! God wants us to praise his name! Is it wrong to pray using Gods name? No!So I would say no: it is not wrong to say Yahweh as long as you don't use it to curse or swear. You can use it in a prayer, you can use it to praise or worship God. That is not wrong.Jewish Answer"Yahweh" is not the correct spelling, but rather a mistakenly attempted transliteration of the Name of the Creator. The pronunciation "Yahweh" is a concoction of modern theology. There are many reasons why Jews do not pronounce the name. Predominant of which is - No one knows how to pronounce the Tetragrammaton. One can see it as that the name is beyond the ability of humans to pronounce or verbalise. By pronouncing the name, a human would commit pejoration on the Creator. A pejorative is committed when describing someone with an inaccurate description of that person. The Tetragrammaton signifies the infinite characteristics of the Creator. Therefore, someone who wishes to pronounce it would have to know what those characteristics are. While Christians and Muslims believe that pronouncing a name of the Creator is the supreme way to be identified with the Creator, Jews are taught that observing the Sabbath and the commandments are the ways to identify with the Creator. Therefore, one way to see it is - to learn to pronounce the name of the Creator is not by verbally pronouncing but by learning and practicing the precepts of the Torah. Therefore, attempting to pronounce the name verbally rather than observing the precepts surrounding the name in the Torah would be committing pejoration on the Creator. By verbally pronouncing the name would then seem to be a lazy short-cut to pronouncing the name. Don't you hate it when someone describes your ethnic group with a convenient syllabic stereotype? Jews especially know how it feels to be stereotyped by inaccuracies. Therefore, it will be dificult for Jews to stereotype their Creator by pronouncing the name.
The word kindergarten originates from?
A Kind of HistoryWhen someone uses the word "origin," "property," or "birth," they are referring to something specifically, but many years ago one word could have meant any or all of these things. With origins from the word "kin," initially spelled gecynde, or gakundi, the word "kind" has been used in written texts as a noun or adjective in some variation or spelling since around the end of the ninth century (Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd ed. 436). Over the last 1,200 years, the word "kind" has lost many of its meanings; though all of its meanings have had something to do with either the origins of a person or thing. For example, "kind" could have been used to mean the property belonging to someone by birth, a person's character, gender, family, or natural state (436). Most of these definitions have not been used for the last few hundred years, and only in the last two hundred years have the original meanings become the few we know today. The initial definitions have not been lost or erased, but only integrated with the contemporary usage of the word.A brief history of the word "kin" must be explained before the history of "kind" because "kind" originates from "kin." In Old English, the genitive form of "kin" could have been written cynnes, cynne, and cynna depending on number and gender, but later became kunne, kynne, kyn, and kin (OED 434). Whether or not the word was spelled starting with a "c" or a "k" seems to have been arbitrary because as early as 897 the word was spelled "kynn," but then in 1000 spelled "cyn" (434). It is also interesting to note that specifically in southern England, the word "kin" comes from the plural form of the word "cow," which in Old English was written "kýn" (1080). In a sense, this definition is retained when "kin" becomes "kind," except that instead of specifically meaning "cows," it means "property belonging to one by birth." "Kin" and "kind" were apparently interchangeable until the form of the word "kynne" was reduced with the help of the borrowed Old French word "manere," which meant "manner." Manere did not directly affect the word kin, but promoted the use of "kind" (435):"The reduction of kin to its simple uninflected form may have been assisted by the equivalent use of menere (manner) from OFr.. which is thus found, as threo maer men = men of three kinds or sorts. In this, at an early period, we find of inserted: an manere of fisce, al maner o suet spices, the syntactical relation between the words being thus reversed, and although this appears to have rarely extended to kin itself, it affected its later representative kind… so that we now say 'all kinds of things'" (OED, 435)After "kind" replaced "kin," it did not take long for people to use "kind" in any way they could. This is evident in the fact that by the end of the ninth century, when looking at five different texts, "kind" is used in five different ways. All five definitions, though sometimes abstractly, had to do with things acquired by birth. Depending on the context, the word "gecynd(e)" could be used to mean property belonging to one by birth, the quality of someone derived from birth, the established order of things, "a natural quality, property or characteristic," or race of an animal or plant (OED 436). The connection between these definitions and "kin" is apparent because family is something that "belongs" to one by birth. The quality of a person is derived from the influence of their family, and a family is an "established order" of people. The species to which someone, or thing belongs is in a sense their family, or kind.If one were to say in the twelfth century, "that is not my kind," depending on the context, it might be difficult to understand exactly what the speaker meant. Probably for this reason people started modifying the word "kind." "1200: Hie giuen here elmesse noht for godes luue, ac for neheboredon oðer for kinraden" (OED 441). Instead of saying, "the kind of man," or, "the family kind," "kind" was compounded as either a prefix or suffix to form words such as "kindness," "kindom," "kindred," and "mankind." Similar to the uses of "kin" and "kind," which both meant "family," before "mankind" was "mankin;" though "mankind" superseded "mankin" gradually in the fourteenth century (441). The use of the word "kind" as a prefix in "kindred" may have formed in parallel to the word "kynde," but "the modern kindred, which first became common in the 17th century, appears to have arisen through [the] phonetic development of d between n and r, as in thunder" (441).In roughly the next century, given the fluid nature of the word the word, "kind" gained many new meanings, though a few of them seem to be specifications of the old ones. For example, during the year 1000 the word "kind" was used to mean "the way natural or proper to anyone," which probably comes from the definition used in 888: "the character or quality derived from birth"[1] (OED, 436). It is also important to note that the words "birth, origin and descent" were meant by "kind" because this lead the way to many things having to do with birth. In 1000, "kind" was used to mean birth, natural form or condition, gender, manner, offspring or kindred, a class of people or objects, and rarely sexual organs (437). After "kind" was used for "family," more definitions concerning the family were made. In the 1400's, "kind" could be used to mean family, descent, ancestral race from which one descends, a generation (rarely), type, in order or good condition, and out of order, or bad condition. The definition concerning good, or bad follows a logical path because for one to be treated as though they are "in the family" is "in kind" and "outside of the family," or "out of kind."; as an example, from Lanfranc's Cirurg in 1400, "Of a wounde bollid and out of kynde" (436). By 1500, certain usages appear to have been condensed, or fell out of use altogether. In written texts at least, "kind" stopped being used to refer to someone's sexual organs, their generation, their natural state or quality, and their genealogy. From 1600 onward, "kind" has kept its current meaning, except for a strange usage in the mid 1800's until the very early 1900's, where it was used to mean "the worst kind, or very badly;" however, this usage is only limited colloquially to the United States (437). As an example from an 1877 text, "I licked him the worst kind" (437). As can be seen by the end of the nineteenth century, people are no longer spelling the word "gecynde."By looking at bits of text containing variations of the word "kind" over the last 1,200 years, it is clear that the changes in spelling took place gradually. The spellings "gecynde" and "gecynd" were consistently used in Old English until around the twelfth century when the "ge" was dropped and the word was spelled icunde, ikunde, cynd, cunde, suinde, kuinde, kynde, kunde, kende, kynd, kinde, and kind (OED, 436). The cy spelling is used less frequently from the eleventh century until the thirteenth century, where it is not used at all. Instead, "cy" was replaced with "cu", or "icu", as in the words "cund, cunde, or icunde." Any variation of the word with the first letter as "c" stops by the fourteenth century. The current spelling of the word "kind" appears as early as 1300, though it is not consistent because the "e," or "es" ending does not go away until the late sixteenth century. The "y" in "kynd" falls out of usage somewhere in the early 1600's and from that point on, the word has been spelled "kind."With a few exceptions, the word "kind" has generally meant the same thing for well over a thousand years, and the definitions which did not fit the trend fell out of use. When someone says, "that was very kind of you," what they mean is, "you are treating me like we were born of the same family." However, as in the 1800s where "kind" was used in a negative connotation, perhaps "kind" will undergo pejoration, which is a semantic change from a positive usage to a negative. In a thesaurus from the year 2080, "conniving" might be synonymous with "kind."Works Cited"Cow." The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Page 1080. Print"Kin." The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Pages 434-435. Print"Kind." The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Pages 436-438. Print"Kindred." The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Pages 441-442. Print"Mankind." The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. Page 321. Print[1]
