0
It was noticed that when things burn, they often leave behind an ash or residue that doesn't burn. It was suggested that before it burns, a flammable object contains some substance called phlogiston, which would make it burn, and when the phlogiston is used up, what is left over would not be able to burn. This theory was later shown to be wrong, and phlogiston is no longer part of the science of chemistry.
What else can I help you with?
What is mean by phlogiston?
Phlogiston was a theoretical substance that was once believed to be responsible for combustion. It was thought to be released during burning, explaining why objects burned and became lighter. However, the concept of phlogiston has been discredited, and combustion is now understood as a chemical reaction involving oxygen.
What element was discovered in 1775?
Phlogiston was a theoretical substance proposed in 1667 by Johann Joachim Becher as a key feature of his phlogiston theory. It was supposed to be released during combustion and related processes. However, the concept was eventually disproven with the development of modern chemistry.
What is the mixture of calx and phlogiston?
lead calx + phlogiston = metallic lead
What did scientist think phlogiston was?
Phlogiston can be defined as "a hypothetical substance once believed to be present in all combustible materials and to be released during burning." Chemistry was so underdeveloped at the time Antoine Lavoisier gained interest in it that it could hardly be called a science. The prevailing view of combustion was the Phlogiston Theory which involved a weightless or nearly weightless substance known as phlogiston. Metals and fire were considered to be rich in phlogiston and earth was considered phlogiston poor. The following were the main theories put forward for 'phlogiston': * Weight loss when combustibles are burned because they lose phlogiston * Fire burns out in an enclosed space because it saturates the air with phlogiston * Charcoal leaves very little residue when burned because it is made mostly of phlogiston * Animals die in an airtight space because the air becomes saturated with phlogiston * Some metal calxes turn to metals when heated with charcoal because the phlogiston from the charcoal restores the phlogiston in the metal
What evidence is there to prove phlogiston theory of burning was correct?
The phlogiston theory has been debunked by the discovery of oxygen. When materials burn, they combine with oxygen, not phlogiston as believed in the theory. The understanding of combustion and oxidation provided by oxygen led to the rejection of the phlogiston theory.
Who rejected phlogiston theory?
Antoine Lavoisier is credited with rejecting the phlogiston theory. Through his experiments and observations, he was able to show that combustion involved a process of oxidation rather than the release of phlogiston. This led to the development of modern chemistry.
Was the phlogiston theory of burning correct?
No, it was not. The phenomena explained by the theory are now known to be a result of oxidation, and phlogiston does not exist.
Why did the phlogiston theory change peoples ideas about burning?
because it changed their mind to belive that phlogiston is in flammable things.
What are the good points of the phlogiston theory?
a combustible material is made up of 2 parts: the calx and phlogiston when a substance burnt the phlogiston into air and calx(ash) left behind so there are no good points of this theory
Why phlogiston is an element?
Phlogiston is a hypothetical substance which at one time was thought to be the basis of combustion, but which is now known to be fictitious. It is not an element.
When iron rusts is it a phlogiston theory or a oxygen theory?
It is a process that involves oxygen. The phlogiston theory has been disprooven for a long time.
Did chemists believe in the phlogiston theory?
Yes, chemists believed in the phlogiston theory in the 17th and 18th centuries. It was thought that when substances burned, they released a substance called phlogiston. However, the theory was eventually disproven with the development of modern chemistry.
