0
What else can I help you with?
What evidence is there to prove phlogiston theory of burning was correct?
The phlogiston theory has been debunked by the discovery of oxygen. When materials burn, they combine with oxygen, not phlogiston as believed in the theory. The understanding of combustion and oxidation provided by oxygen led to the rejection of the phlogiston theory.
What is the phylogiston theory of burning - how is it correct?
The phlogiston theory of burning is an outdated concept that suggested a substance called "phlogiston" was released during combustion. It was believed that the presence of phlogiston was necessary for materials to burn. However, this theory has been disproven with the advancement of modern chemistry, which identifies combustion as a process involving the reaction of materials with oxygen in the air.
Why did the phlogiston theory change peoples ideas about burning?
because it changed their mind to belive that phlogiston is in flammable things.
What did Johann becher and georg stahl invent?
Proposed the theory of burning called the phlogiston theory
What evidence was there to suggesst that the phlogiston theory was correct?
Support for the phlogiston theory came from observing that substances such as wood and charcoal released a substance (phlogiston) when burned, leaving behind ash. This was believed to explain the weight loss during combustion. Additionally, the theory was used to account for the process of rusting in metals.
How did Antoine lavoisier disprove the phlogiston theory?
Antoine Lavoisier disproved the phlogiston theory by experimenting with combustion reactions and showing that burning substances gained weight instead of losing it. He demonstrated that oxygen is an essential component of combustion, not phlogiston as proposed by the theory. Lavoisier's precise measurements and meticulous approach to experimental evidence played a crucial role in discrediting the phlogiston theory and establishing the foundation for modern chemistry.
What was the evidence of phlogiston theory?
One piece of evidence for the phlogiston theory was the observation that combustion released a substance called "phlogiston" from burning materials, leaving behind ash. Another piece of evidence was the weight gain of metals when they were heated in air, which was believed to be due to the absorption of phlogiston. However, the theory was eventually disproven with the discovery of oxygen and the understanding of oxidation.
What is the phlogiston?
The alchemist and physician J. J. Becher proposed the phlogiston theoryThe phlogiston theory (from the Ancient Greek φλογιστόν phlogistón "burning up", from φλόξ phlóx "flame"), first stated in 1667 by Johann Joachim Becher, is an obsolete scientific theory that postulated the existence of a fire-like element called "phlogiston", which was contained within combustible bodies and released during combustion. The theory was an attempt to explain processes of burning such as combustion and the rusting of metals, which are now collectively known as oxidation.
What evidence was there to prove that the phlogiston pheory was correct?
1. I believe that theories can only be disproven, not proven. i.e. You create a theory and then you try to disprove it, if you can't then you can consider that theory to be true (convicing other people may be more difficult however). 2. I think the theory you describe is disproven as and todays equivalent is what we now know as 'oxidation'.
Did Antoine lavoisier agree with the phlogiston theory?
The Phlogiston theory was before it waslearned that matter burns by using oxygen. Most chemists looked to explain combustion as the release of an unknown substance, which they named "phlogiston". Phlogiston theory was a conceptual breakthrough that helped chemists conduct experiments and share ideas.
When iron rusts is it a phlogiston theory or a oxygen theory?
It is a process that involves oxygen. The phlogiston theory has been disprooven for a long time.
Who propose the phlogiston theory?
The phlogiston theory was first proposed by Johann Joachim Becher in 1667. This theory is now considered obsolete and was replaced by the oxygen theory.
