0
What else can I help you with?
What evidence is there to prove phlogiston theory of burning was correct?
The phlogiston theory has been debunked by the discovery of oxygen. When materials burn, they combine with oxygen, not phlogiston as believed in the theory. The understanding of combustion and oxidation provided by oxygen led to the rejection of the phlogiston theory.
What was the evidence of phlogiston theory?
One piece of evidence for the phlogiston theory was the observation that combustion released a substance called "phlogiston" from burning materials, leaving behind ash. Another piece of evidence was the weight gain of metals when they were heated in air, which was believed to be due to the absorption of phlogiston. However, the theory was eventually disproven with the discovery of oxygen and the understanding of oxidation.
Was there evidence to prove the phlogiston theory correct?
The phlogiston theory was widely held in the 17th and 18th centuries to explain combustion and oxidation. However, it was eventually disproven with the discovery of oxygen by Lavoisier. This discovery provided a more accurate explanation for the process of combustion.
Who rejected phlogiston theory?
Antoine Lavoisier is credited with rejecting the phlogiston theory. Through his experiments and observations, he was able to show that combustion involved a process of oxidation rather than the release of phlogiston. This led to the development of modern chemistry.
Why was the phlogiston unsatisfactory?
The concept of phlogiston was unsatisfactory because it failed to explain observations in chemistry, such as the increase in weight of metals when they rusted or burned. It was eventually replaced by the theory of combustion with oxygen based on more experimental evidence.
What evidence is there to prove phlogiston theory of burning was correct?
The phlogiston theory has been debunked by the discovery of oxygen. When materials burn, they combine with oxygen, not phlogiston as believed in the theory. The understanding of combustion and oxidation provided by oxygen led to the rejection of the phlogiston theory.
Was the phlogiston theory of burning correct?
No, it was not. The phenomena explained by the theory are now known to be a result of oxidation, and phlogiston does not exist.
What was the evidence of phlogiston theory?
One piece of evidence for the phlogiston theory was the observation that combustion released a substance called "phlogiston" from burning materials, leaving behind ash. Another piece of evidence was the weight gain of metals when they were heated in air, which was believed to be due to the absorption of phlogiston. However, the theory was eventually disproven with the discovery of oxygen and the understanding of oxidation.
How did Antoine lavoisier disprove the phlogiston theory?
Antoine Lavoisier disproved the phlogiston theory by experimenting with combustion reactions and showing that burning substances gained weight instead of losing it. He demonstrated that oxygen is an essential component of combustion, not phlogiston as proposed by the theory. Lavoisier's precise measurements and meticulous approach to experimental evidence played a crucial role in discrediting the phlogiston theory and establishing the foundation for modern chemistry.
Was there evidence to prove the phlogiston theory correct?
The phlogiston theory was widely held in the 17th and 18th centuries to explain combustion and oxidation. However, it was eventually disproven with the discovery of oxygen by Lavoisier. This discovery provided a more accurate explanation for the process of combustion.
What is the phylogiston theory of burning - how is it correct?
The phlogiston theory of burning is an outdated concept that suggested a substance called "phlogiston" was released during combustion. It was believed that the presence of phlogiston was necessary for materials to burn. However, this theory has been disproven with the advancement of modern chemistry, which identifies combustion as a process involving the reaction of materials with oxygen in the air.
What evidence was there to prove that the phlogiston pheory was correct?
1. I believe that theories can only be disproven, not proven. i.e. You create a theory and then you try to disprove it, if you can't then you can consider that theory to be true (convicing other people may be more difficult however). 2. I think the theory you describe is disproven as and todays equivalent is what we now know as 'oxidation'.
When iron rusts is it a phlogiston theory or a oxygen theory?
It is a process that involves oxygen. The phlogiston theory has been disprooven for a long time.
Who propose the phlogiston theory?
The phlogiston theory was first proposed by Johann Joachim Becher in 1667. This theory is now considered obsolete and was replaced by the oxygen theory.
Who rejected phlogiston theory?
Antoine Lavoisier is credited with rejecting the phlogiston theory. Through his experiments and observations, he was able to show that combustion involved a process of oxidation rather than the release of phlogiston. This led to the development of modern chemistry.
Why was the phlogiston unsatisfactory?
The concept of phlogiston was unsatisfactory because it failed to explain observations in chemistry, such as the increase in weight of metals when they rusted or burned. It was eventually replaced by the theory of combustion with oxygen based on more experimental evidence.
What is the principle of the phlogistan theory?
The phlogiston theory was a scientific hypothesis that proposed that all combustible materials contain a substance called "phlogiston," which is released during combustion. According to the theory, when a substance burns, it loses phlogiston. This theory has been disproven by modern chemistry.
