0
What else can I help you with?
What evidence is there to prove phlogiston theory of burning was correct?
The phlogiston theory has been debunked by the discovery of oxygen. When materials burn, they combine with oxygen, not phlogiston as believed in the theory. The understanding of combustion and oxidation provided by oxygen led to the rejection of the phlogiston theory.
Theory stating that the sun contains a small amount of platinum using what you know about spectroscopy explain how i might prove or disprove this theory?
You could use spectroscopy to analyze the light emitted by the sun to look for the characteristic spectral lines of platinum. If you detect these specific spectral lines in the sun's spectrum, it would support the theory. Conversely, if you do not find these lines in the sun's spectrum, it would provide evidence against the theory.
How was Dalton's atomic theory similar to Democritus atomic theory?
Both Dalton and Democritus proposed that matter is made up of indivisible particles called atoms that are different in size and shape. They also believed that atoms are in constant motion and can combine to form different substances.
How can an stm help improve daltons theory?
An STM (scanning tunneling microscope) can help improve Dalton's atomic theory by providing visual evidence of individual atoms and their arrangements on surfaces. This experimental data can offer insights into the precise structure and behavior of atoms, supporting or refining Dalton's ideas based on empirical observation. Additionally, STM allows for the direct observation of atomic interactions and bonding, which can lead to a deeper understanding of atomic behavior beyond what Dalton's theory originally proposed.
What did Redi prove in his experiment?
Redi's experiment proved that maggots do not spontaneously generate from decaying meat, but rather come from the eggs of flies. This refuted the prevailing theory of spontaneous generation.
What evidence is there to prove phlogiston theory of burning was correct?
The phlogiston theory has been debunked by the discovery of oxygen. When materials burn, they combine with oxygen, not phlogiston as believed in the theory. The understanding of combustion and oxidation provided by oxygen led to the rejection of the phlogiston theory.
What evidence was there to prove that the phlogiston pheory was correct?
1. I believe that theories can only be disproven, not proven. i.e. You create a theory and then you try to disprove it, if you can't then you can consider that theory to be true (convicing other people may be more difficult however). 2. I think the theory you describe is disproven as and todays equivalent is what we now know as 'oxidation'.
How can you prove that this theory is correct?
In science, a theory is, by definition, proven and accepted as fact.
What evidence did Arthur Holmes have to support his theory?
he didn't have anything to prove
Why did most scientists reject Wegner theory for nearly a half century?
They rejected Wenger's theory for half a century because he didn't have the evidence to prove his theory No, He did have evidence to prove his theory, they just did not believe him- TheSystem because of their lack of knowledge of the Earth He actually had evidence, but it was actually because the hypothesis interferred with their own hypothesis about how mountains form.
What did Alfred Weneger try to prove?
Alfred Weneger was trying to prove his theory of Continental Drift. Many other scientists before him had the same theory, but they never could prove it. He had five pieces of evidence.
How did lavoisier prove stahl theory wrong?
Antoine Lavoisier disproved Georg Stahl's phlogiston theory by demonstrating that combustion requires oxygen, not a mystical substance called phlogiston. Through careful experiments, he showed that when substances burn, they actually gain weight due to their combination with oxygen from the air, contradicting the idea that they lose phlogiston. Lavoisier's work laid the foundation for modern chemistry by establishing the law of conservation of mass and highlighting the role of gases in chemical reactions.
How was Dalton's atomic theory similar to democritus's atomic theory?
They both thought the same theory but Dalton had evidence to prove it, unlike Democritus.
Future evidence can prove a scientific theory to be incorrect.Is the following true or false?
True.
Is a kracken real?
i believe that the kracken really does exist, but we have no real evidence to prove that theory.....
Why were most scientists disagreeing with Alfred Wegeners continental drift theory?
There was no evidence to prove it
Can a hypothesis lead to a theory.?
Yes, because if enough people prove the hypothesis and produce evidence supporting it it can become a theory.
