1. I believe that theories can only be disproven, not proven. i.e. You create a theory and then you try to disprove it, if you can't then you can consider that theory to be true (convicing other people may be more difficult however).
2. I think the theory you describe is disproven as and todays equivalent is what we now know as 'oxidation'.
It is impossible to prove a hypothesis true because science aims to falsify hypotheses rather than prove them true. A hypothesis can only be supported by evidence, but it can never be proven definitively true because new evidence could potentially challenge or change our interpretation of it.
One mathematical evidence that can prove the Earth is round is the observation of the curvature of the Earth's surface. As one travels long distances, the angle of the horizon changes, which can be calculated using geometry to show that the Earth is not flat but curved.
It is impossible to prove a theory because science relies on evidence to support hypotheses, rather than providing absolute proof. Theories are continually tested and refined based on new information, so they can only be supported or rejected based on the available evidence.
No theories are correct. That is why they are called theories. These are the best that can be done with present knowledge, they explain and make prediction that could otherwise not be made. If those explanations are useful and the predictions turn out to be correct it strengthens the theory. It does not prove it. When a theory is proven to be true it is then called a law.
It is impossible to prove a hypothesis true or false definitively. A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon that requires testing through experimentation and evidence gathering, but it cannot be definitively proven without a complete understanding of all factors involved.
The phlogiston theory has been debunked by the discovery of oxygen. When materials burn, they combine with oxygen, not phlogiston as believed in the theory. The understanding of combustion and oxidation provided by oxygen led to the rejection of the phlogiston theory.
The phlogiston theory was widely held in the 17th and 18th centuries to explain combustion and oxidation. However, it was eventually disproven with the discovery of oxygen by Lavoisier. This discovery provided a more accurate explanation for the process of combustion.
To have correct evidence to his work .And to prove his work and aim of his work;
"Acts" refer to behaviors or actions. "Prove" means providing evidence or demonstrating that something is true or correct through actions or results.
If you are the defendant, prove that you are innocent. If you are the plaintiff, prove that your accussation is correct. Apart from that, everything depends on your particular issue and the evidence that goes with it.
Yes, "evidenced" is a grammatically correct word. It is the past tense of the verb "evidence," meaning to show or prove something.
The best way to prove employee dishonesty is by keeping a record of evidence that may prove your view. Without evidence or a witness, it may be difficult to prove it.
it is important to write a conclusion to prove a hypothesis because then you have no evidence if your hypothesis was tested or correct or not. from Rezwan Haque I.S.204 Academy Harvord. class 620
Falsehood is to deceive as evidence is to prove. Prove is a word that is commonlyÊ used in law courts.
Yes, there is evidence to prove that they lie, even though they deny it.
The likely word is proof (evidence).The verb form is to prove (confirm or show as true).
Evidence can prove, or disprove, the case against you.