Yes, there is evidence to prove that they lie, even though they deny it.
To prove your existence, evidence such as personal identification documents, biometric data, or witnesses who can testify to interacting with you in person would be necessary. Digital footprint, such as social media accounts or official records, can also demonstrate your existence.
Belief in the existence of extraterrestrial life is based on the vastness of the universe and the high probability that other planets could support life, even though direct evidence may be lacking.
Yes, they are lying even though we are aware of their deception.
The relationship between memetics and pseudoscience is that memetics is a field that studies how ideas spread and evolve, while pseudoscience refers to beliefs or practices that are presented as scientific but lack evidence or credibility. Some pseudoscientific ideas may spread rapidly through society due to the principles of memetics, even though they are not based on scientific evidence.
Science cannot really PROVE anything. If you consider the arguments of, for example, the 18th century philosopher David Hume, then you will see that science cannot prove things as it consistently relies on induction to form conclusions and induction does not say that something is definitely the result of something else, only that it could be or is likely or even appears at this moment to be the only explanation. Therefore, if we put this belief into the original question "Can science prove something that does not exist?", both yes and no can be argued. No because science cannot prove anything, therefore, it cannot prove something that does exist and it cannot prove something that does not exist. Yes because if you do still believe that science can prove that existing things do exist, you will believe that it can prove that non-exisiting also exist because obviously if a mistake is made to come to this false conclusion, you (the person who has found such a result) will not know the mistake has occured and will not question it if you have done everything right according to the procedures for proving things, because you believe that if you have followed such procedures then you must have proven it because that is the way you believe science works. A complicated discussion really, depends what you believe about the reliabity of 'fact' and the nature of 'proof'. it's true the science is can really prove any thing.=]
Even though he is putatively regarded as the killer of Ellen Hayes, there is not a shred of physical evidence to prove it.
Honestly... NONE!!! Though there is little "scientific" (what an awful word) proof that spirits exist... there is even less to prove otherwise. Open for discussion, B.D.W. WLFD616@Gmail.com
This question's answer is entirely subjective. It's a matter of opinion, not something we can prove through evidence. Most of us would probably find even the most enlightened fascist government to be undesirable though.
They have evidence, but if they cant prove something, even with the evidence, it becomes a theroy, or belief. So sometimes it is based on evidence and fact, sometimes on belief.
That depends on where you live and what, specifically, your relation to this girl is. In most locations, if you're not married and you deny that the child is yours, she has to prove it. If you are married, though, some locations have a "presumption of paternity" meaning that even if it turns out its not biologically your child, legally it is.
you just prove to him that you are not even though he probally truly does not think that you are a lesbian
Condensation, freezing the air.
One of the main arguments in favor of natural law theory is that even though there is no evidence to prove its existence, it does not mean it doesn\'t exist, and faith is the main vehicle to implementing it.
in shippuden. well kinda. they go on a lot of missions together and just walk with each other (even though temari and shikamaru deny it). in shippuden. well kinda. they go on a lot of missions together and just walk with each other (even though temari and shikamaru deny it).
Prove it if you are really mean it! You have to know what does she wants from you to believe that. If you really know her, then you must know it. But hey, I'm not judging you here, I want to help you. You can go to this page and read all information about how to prove it to your girlfriend that you are loyal and not cheating on her: goo.gl/yoqUK5 **************************************** It is not really up to you to prove that you are not cheating; it would be up to your accuser to offer evidence that you are. If there is no such evidence, then there is no valid reason to accuse you. If there is evidence that you are cheating, at that point you can explain what has really happened and why it might appear that you are cheating even though you are not. Sometimes, there are ambiguous social situations which can be interpretted in more than one way.
it proved to the British that the colonists had the will to fight. even though they lost they had the will to fight.
Not legally, no.