halo has to be the most played first person shooter only because when people play cod all they is run around and get shot at and die and that is not fun at all but when you play halo and you get shot at you have a chance to turn around and shoot back or take cover.
Answers will vary. CoD is modern and Halo is Futuristic. People lean to CoD more
Cod is way better than gaylo cod is way more real than gaylo you dont run into the open with an 100 kilo suit on getting shot. Cod is way more fun and gaylo (halo) . Also think about zombies you halo nerds out there.
Halo 3 and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 are both good games. It depends on the player though. Halo 3 is mostly unrealistic but is played for fun. COD: Modern Warfare 2 Is more realistic but sometimes people tend to become serious because COD involves more shooting than Halo 3. - Henry
djjdej3nfr2end
its cod mw2 not halo
the halo 3 and cod world at war master appears to be deco rambo
IT all is based on opinoin. COD is for noobs and halo is a skillful game for casual and pro gamers alike.
Its quite easy geoff, Cod is takes more skill because its easier to die and halo is for noobs because you start off with 400% health and every rushes to power weapons. vote Kennedy for prez.
cod sux go play halo
Call of duty is more realistic than halo and contains more blood. Call of duty also allows you to knife so in many ways halo is more appropriate but it doesn't necessarily mean its more fun.
it just depends which you like better. they are both great games. i enjoy Halo a lot more than COD though.
Well... call of duty has killstreak rewards and classes but Halo has Forge and better graphics. It depends what king of game you like. In COD you can kill people easily and in Halo everyone has shields taking longer to kill people. But because Halo has medals, forge, thearter and good graphics I say Halo is better. Cod 5 is quite good though as it has attack dogs and zombie mode. If you were to compare Halo Reach and Cod 7, Halo Reach is miles better