0
What is recent research findings support Darwins theory of evolution?
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the six scientific advances since Darwins death that have provided support for the theory of evolution?
There is nothing newly or old that support Darwin's evolution theory.Some of scientists reject Darwin's Theory of evolution and some of them don't. t I personally support it fairly due to my own beliefs and other scientist reject it for their on. Don't think that what you read in the Internet is always correct. The edge of science will always be on debate. Let me note that Darwin lived in another era and the ability of explaining natural laws was not even close than the way we can explain it today. So for me he earned my respected.
Does the existence of intermediate forms support or not support the theory of evolution?
Intermediate forms are predicted by evolutionary science in several ways. Their presence supports the theory of evolution.
Why are the ideas about evolution called theories?
Because although there is evidence to support the claims, it isn't possible to prove evolution indefinately.
How does similarities in body structure support evolution?
it shows how they evolve into another
What are the types of evidence that support evolution?
\that the animals can be found all around the world fossils
Darwins theory of evolution views at the time of his work and social forces that led to support for the theory?
There is no proven theory of evolution only the physical evidence of what Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
How do fossil and biochemicals support the theory of evolution?
Because due to Darwins theory of evolution, fossils lead to adaptations over time therefor giving us reason to find evolution within human beings and animals.
What roles does a scientific journals play in research?
There are various reasons to use scientific journals. One is that it can be the basis of research. The research may have been done to either support or falsify specific hypothesis introduced by scientific journal(s). It can also support or falsify the findings of scientific journal(s). Another reason to use scientific journals is the other way around. Scientific journals can be used to support or falsify research findings. The main point is: scientific journals presents ideas and findings. Because hypothesis are deemed "plausible" until proven false, a research is somehow useless if scientific journals that only support the research findings are included. Findings that contradict the research data must be included. If not, then at least, the audience knows that there was either not enough information to contradict the research or the research findings are partly "true." Moreover, scientific journals tell the audience "on what basis did the researchers conducted their research on." Is there enough credibility? (Background) Information? etc.
What is thematic research?
thematic research : anaylsis and findings that support trends and common themes such as "mental illness and violent representations" or "ethnic minorities and crime"
Which source would be the best choice to support a research paper on the evolution of baseball in the US?
I don’t kno
Are you desended from apes?
Charles Darwin's theory of evolution suggest that, yes, we are indeed descended from common ancestors of the apes. Later archaeological and DNA findings support his theory of evolution. However Christians or other religious people believe otherwise.
Do anxiety treatments help to cure nightmares?
Researchers also have conducted studies of medications for the treatment of nightmares. However, it should be noted that the research findings in support of these treatments are more tentative than findings from studies of Imagery Rehearsal Therapy.
Does comparative religions support the the theory of evolution?
'Comparative religion' is merely the comparison of differences and similarities between two or more religions or sects. It has nothing to do with evolution (a scientific principle) and support from religions is irrelevant to science. Most religious groups recognise that the scientific community has validated evolution, and accept these findings as correct, while some do not. Recognition of evlution's validation is one criteria to compare religions with.
What are the six scientific advances since Darwins death that have provided support for the theory of evolution?
There is nothing newly or old that support Darwin's evolution theory.Some of scientists reject Darwin's Theory of evolution and some of them don't. t I personally support it fairly due to my own beliefs and other scientist reject it for their on. Don't think that what you read in the Internet is always correct. The edge of science will always be on debate. Let me note that Darwin lived in another era and the ability of explaining natural laws was not even close than the way we can explain it today. So for me he earned my respected.
When did Eisenhower mandate evolution?
President Eisenhower did not mandate evolution, this is a myth as far as my research has shown. As a matter of fact he was a staunch believer in Creationism. See link: http://www.icr.org/article/presidential-support-for-creationism
What do you mean by application support?
Support the all related to the applications ,Error , findings and all
Do any qualified scientists support evolution?
The vast majority of scientists support evolution. There is no longer any debate in the scientific community about whether evolution occurs, only the mechanisms in which evolution acts upon is debated.
