It has no significance at all, it is redundant.
Yes. "Further" is almost always sufficient. "more" is superfluous, causing "furthermore" to be, in effect, redundant. Sort of like "whether or not." "Whether" already implies a choice. You needn't add the negative option.
The abbreviation is m. The word lineal or linear is redundant.
Presumably, yes! A redundant operation, but valid all the same.
Yes, it is a verb, or at least a type of verb. Experienced is a linking verb.
there is no verb (PEACE!)
Past Perfect
it is passive redundant...
A and B are redundant. There is redundancy between A and B.Both "with" and "to" are awkward, if not incorrect.
The usual expression is simply "Opus est" (It / that is needed), as pronouns such as "id" (it) are usually omitted in Latin, because they are redundant with the tense of the verb.
Not usually. It is the past tense and past participle of the verb to yelp (make a short, sharp cry) and is normally a verb form. It could be an adjective used to describe these noises, as in "yelped cries of alarm" but this is practically redundant.
The usual expression is simply "Opus est" (It / that is needed), as pronouns such as "id" (it) are usually omitted in Latin, because they are redundant with the tense of the verb.
Tagalog translation of REDUNDANT: paulit-ulit
Tagalog translation of redundant: paulit-ulit
Anything redundant is a back-up system.
A redundant adjective has the same meaning of another adjective.Example : She was holding a tiny little baby mouse. Tiny or little are redundant.
As far as i know there is no such thing. Servers can be redundant in many ways but never have redundant motherboards. You can have redundant power supplies , hard drives, processors, memory. However, if the motherboard dies everything goes with it.