It is cosmology using Einstein's theories of special and general relativity. This is the modern form of cosmology.
The old form, called Newtonian cosmology, is based on the laws of Newton (which we now know are not accurate for big things such as galaxies), but is sometimes still used as an educational device (since it is simpler).
An individual relativist is a person who decides what is right or wrong for him or herself. This person does not rely on what society says.
The relativist (who holds that there is no absolute, universal truth and that all propositions have only relative or limited application) cannot give any justified statement on morality or religion, because he acknowledges no standard or basis for making judgments. If as the relativist holds there is no absolute truth, any moral or religious statements are meaningless and cannot be justified. Any statement the relativist puts forward is nullified by the relativist's own claim that no statement or viewpoint is absolutely true. The relativist's statement might be true relative to himself, but not relative to another individual.
A relativist claims that truth and morality are not absolute, but vary depending on individual perspectives, cultural beliefs, or societal norms. They believe that there are no universal truths or values that apply to everyone in all circumstances.
An example of a relativist statement is "What is considered right or wrong depends on the cultural context in which it occurs." This suggests that morality is not absolute and is influenced by societal norms and values.
A cultural relativist does not believe in an absolute morality--what is moral changes according to the cultural context and situation.
No. He was a reasonable scientist who did some theology on the side that got him into trouble.
just as interesting and worthy of study as any other
just as interesting and worthy of study as any other
The relativist fallacy assumes that all beliefs and values are equally valid, without acknowledging that some beliefs may have harmful consequences or lack empirical evidence. This can lead to moral and cultural relativism where individuals or societies justify unethical actions based on subjective beliefs. It also dismisses the idea of objective truth or morality.
A relativist might argue that attitudes towards same-sex marriage vary across cultures and societies, and that there is no universal moral standard that dictates whether it is right or wrong. They may advocate for respecting the diverse beliefs and values of different communities when considering the validity of same-sex marriage.
Relativist Fallacy
A relativist would say that same-sex marriage is something that is completely acceptable if society and culture permit that kind of relationship and that it would be cultural imperialism to force a view of acceptance on a society that chooses not to accept the validity of same-sex marriage. Relativism, in general, holds that everything that anybody does can only be evaluated by local moral standards as opposed to universal ones.