In today's notation of Roman numerals it is MCDXCIX
But the Romans themselves probably wrote it out simply as IMD (1500-1 = 1499)
MCCCCLXXXXVIIII (1499) which is in subtractive notation IMD (1500-1). *Incorrect - See discussion
MCCCCLXXXXVIIII (1499) which is in subtractive notation IMD (1500-1). *Incorrect - See discussion
In today's modern notation MCDXCIX are Roman numerals that represent 1499 (1000+400+90+9 = 1499) But the Romans themselves would have probably calculated 1499 on an abacus counting device as MCCCCLXXXXVIIII and by adding I to the right hand side and subtracting I from the left hand side of these numerals simply wrote it out as IMD (-1+1500 = 1499) Today's rules governing the Roman numeral system were introduced during the Middle Ages and that was centuries after the decline of the Roman Empire.
the answer to what is the roman numeral for 101 is CI
XXV is the Roman Numeral for 25
324 written in roman numeral is CCCXXIV
No, K is not a roman numeral.
There is not a Roman Numeral for 0.
The roman numeral for one is I.
Vivid is not a Roman numeral
V is a roman numeral representing the number 5.
M is a roman numeral that represents 1000.