Any and all evidence (and testimony of witnesses) necessary to prove, or refute, the allegations.
A witness can bring in character evidence of their good character when their character is relevant to the case, such as when their credibility is being challenged. This type of evidence can be used to show the witness's reputation for honesty or truthfulness.
Criminal Case: In the view of the prosecutor all he needs is solid probable cause and, hopefully, good evidence and witnesses to present a case to court, The view of the defense - they are looking for possible flaws in the prosecutions case with an eye towards freeing their client.
By having a good reason and a good lawyer. It is up to the court to decide based upon the law and the evidence presented to the court.
Given the number of police programs on television today, most people have probably heard of the term "forensics" without really understanding what it means. While it is true law enforcement uses this kind of evidence to help win cases in criminal court, forensic science in general covers a wide area of studies and evidence-gathering. The majority is related to legal work for court cases, but the term can be used in research and related studies or papers as well.BackgroundForensics evidence essentially follows the theory that the evidence gathered, if preserved as found without manipulation, will point objectively and conclusively to whoever or whatever created it. As a result, such evidence can be extremely valuable in court cases, either criminal or civil. Because much of court presentation is verbal statements and inferences, forensics evidence typically stands out as material juries can wrap their opinions around when making a decision. Lawyers understand this tendency and try to use as much evidence that appears scientific-based as possible.DefinitionTrue forensics evidence is material that has been gathered or collected and preserved using objective, scientific methods that any scientist in the same situation would follow and get the same results. This nature of how the evidence is obtained is critical. In comparison, litigation science is information or analysis that a legal team has had prepared specifically for a court case and no other purpose. Forensics evidence doesn't always have to be collected for the purposes of trial, but in many criminal cases it is used accordingly.The Evidence is Only as Good as Its DefenseDespite the scientific background and appearance of forensics evidence when presented, it has weaknesses. The greatest vulnerability has to do with the methodology of collection and preservation. If intentional manipulation can be proven or at least suspected, the evidence loses its strength to an audience. In many instances, again in criminal court, methods of evidence collection have been thrown out even after decades of use with thousands of cases. Additionally, the Supreme Court has held for forensics evidence to be valid in a legal case, the party or lab that has prepared it for presentation has to be available for legal cross-examination. If refused, the evidence can be considered worthless by a court and thrown out. As a result, naming material "forensics evidence" alone does not win a blank check of legal acceptance.
Evidence and witnesses are only as good as the lawyers questioning them or presenting evidence. Both can be reliable or found unreliable.
Yes, you can take him to court for domestic abuse, but you should be very careful and not be around him when he knows you issued a court date. Have evidence of the beatings and get a good lawyer.
Not a good idea. You wouldn't have a good grasp of the arguments that could be applied and the prior case law that could be called upon. And the court might not allow you to represent yourself in this situation.
The bloodhound tracking nose scent is the only dog that can be used as evidence in a court of law. although other dogs have very good sence of smells and later enough proof will probabaly make it so they can be used as evidence the bloodhounds has the best
To bring to the courthouse for temporary custody, you typically need to have documents such as a completed temporary custody petition or motion, any supporting evidence or affidavits, identification documents, and any relevant court forms or paperwork that may be required. It's always a good idea to check with the courthouse or consult with an attorney to ensure you have all the necessary documents specific to your jurisdiction.
It is NOT a good thing. Unless they contact the mediator or the court ASAP to request a re-scheduling, it might be seen as evidence that they are "abandoning" their case.
The 1987 Supreme Court case that supported the use of evidence obtained with a search warrant that was inaccurate in its specifics is Massachusetts v. Sheppard. In this case, the court ruled that as long as the police officers acted in good faith reliance on the warrant, the evidence could still be used against the defendant.
If you have no real evidence, then trust your wife. If you have evidence, bring it forward and present your case to her and ask again. It needs to be really good evidence or it could damamge your relationship with her.