What is soverenty?

What is soverenty of a country?

A countries sovereignty is it right to determine its own laws and economy.

What was it based upon to make a state be free or slave?

The issue of whether a state would be free or slave was based on factors such as the economic system in place (agricultural vs. industrial), social values concerning slavery, and political power dynamics within the state. These factors influenced whether the state's population supported the institution of slavery or opposed it.

What are the seven principles of the United States government?

The seven principles of government are- 1.Popular Soverenty 2.Republicanism 3.Limited Goverment 4.Federalism 5.Seperation of powers 6.Checks and balances 7.Indvidual rights (THESE ARE IN ORDER)

What would have happened if the US was more aggressive in trying to force the Soviets to retreat from North Vietnam and for the US to do so under the idea of unification of Vietnam?

Since North Vietnam was heavily subsidized by BOTH China and the Soviet Union, a more aggressive stance on North Vietnamese soverenty could easily lead to a direct military conflict with China and the Soviet Union. That was a situation neither of the three countries involved were interested in starting.

Why did war break out in Europe in 1939?

If I understand the forum rules, such excessively long answers, and in a discussion format, should be left for the Discussion Section. But rather then erase them all out, let me point out (at the top for those who don't want to read the discussion) that there are only two possible answers. Here they are:Yes - Germany was an unstoppable machine, driven by the humiliation of the unfair Treaty of Versailles.No - Had England and France stood up to Hitler at the fist attempt at territorial expansion, he would have lost, as he wasn't ready. He would not have recovered from this blow to his credibility.It is the general opinion of most scholars that the second is true, and that war was not inevitable.Now here's all the opinions on it, which later, a supervisor might move to the Discussion Section.AnswerFrom the south pacific to Egypt, from Europe to the arctic, seventy two million people from fifty-five countries perished in what was later termed World War II. This "war to end all wars" was inevitable because nothing could have halted the rise of fascism, nothing could have blocked its expansionist fervor, and nothing could have prevented France and Brittan's policy of appeasement. The spite, horror, and destruction of the Second World War was an inevitable response to world war one and the depression. World War one shattered the confidence which had grown in Europe since the renaissance. The slow starvation of the depression only worsened the situation and made a rebound impossible. Europe's week democracies were usually unable to thrive in the sorrow and mistrust of the 1920's. Germans turned to Hitler not because they agreed with his politics but because he provided an opportunity to take out their rage on something greater then themselves. Fascism was inevitable because Germany, Italy, and Spain were pooling with anger which needed an outlet. Ironically, Hitler came to power as Germany's hope. If it was not him, then the German people would have found another strong leader who could sweep them away. An authoritarian movement in just one country could be explained as a random turn of events, but Germany, Italy, and Spain all going fascist was more then a coincidence, it was a phenomenon. World War II was not caused by Hitler, rather, it was the reciprocation of a long string of cause and effect.When the "big three" resolved to rob Germany and Italy of land that both countries saw as rightfully theirs, they should have been able to foresee their decision's reciprocations. Germans saw themselves as being cheated by the treaty of Versailles, in particular by it's shrinking of Germany. Therefore, the first thing that any strong German leader would do would be to move to right this wrong and regain territory. Nations measure their strength by, among other things, their nation's size. Therefore, nations which seek to become "glorious" usually start by enlarging their territory. For example, England found pride in their enormous empire, and America adopted Manifest destiny for the glory of their country. Along this same mentality, Germany and Italy saw their small size equating to a lesser nation and vowed to reclaim their lands. Italy's invasion of Ethiopia and Germany's invasion of Poland attempted to reclaim the honor stolen by the treaty of Versailles. Europeans do not forget their scars and inevitably try to strike back, only war can heal a European nation's wounds.On the eve of World War I, France and Brittan were still scared from World War I. Trenches from the western front can still be seen from space. This destructive struggle destroyed much of the French country side; thousands of acres of farmland were made unusable for tens of years. French leaders were reluctant to engage in any violence and feared another great war. Because of this fear, both France and Brittan adopted a policy of appeasement, or giving in to an aggressor's demands in order to avoid war. This policy invariably lead to world war because it gave the Germans greater recourses (from the Rhine land and other rich areas seized), greater confidence, and recognition. The same problem strengthened Italy. When Mussolini invaded Ethiopia, he was met with condemnation from the league of nations, but little else. This lack of opposition allowed his week army to remain strong and maintained fascism in Europe. In the pacific, to, the lack of a response to Japan's invasion of Manchuria set the stage for their expansion into the rest of China and other nations in Asia. Tiny little Japan could have never held it's own against the western powers and China, but with Europe and America's neglect, Japan was able to establish itself as a formidable opponent. This failed policy was just one of many factors which led to the inevitable destruction of World War II.While World War II was inevitable, mainly because of effects of World War I, its repetition can be prevented. An understanding of what caused the Second World War can be used to prevent a third. For example, after World War II, the allies (minus the Russians), worked to rebuild Germany instead of crippling in. Germans west of the iron Curtin quickly regained confidence and by the beginning of the twenty-first century, Germany and the United states were such close allies that former President Bush attempted to give the chancellor of Germany a neck rub. This success story was made possible by an understanding of what went wrong to cause World War II. However, the United State's policy of appeasing North Korea rather than using aggressive force has once again failed, with more missile launches and more nuclear advancements. Looking back on the eve of World War II, it is clear that countries with superior military force need to use it against their adversaries before those adversaries become to powerful. By an understanding of history, humanity can make sure that no single war ever again claims 72 million lives.AnswerMartina, Yes. Various records of the Nazi party and German government demonstrate that Hitler and his henchmen were absolutely determined, from the moment they took power, to start another war. Well before 1939 they were planning military and political strategies. We have records on conferences where they discuss who should be attacked first and how they can make excuses for their attacks. Hitler was ready and willing to go to war over Czheckoslovakia in 1938 although his generals did not think they were strong enough. If France and Britain had not suddenly capitulated and sold out the Czhecs, Hitler's plan was to have his own ambassador to Czechoslovakia assassinated and use that as a pretext for attacking. France and Britain's duplicity merely delayed things for another year. AnswerIt is a difficult question. War was certainly inevitable in view of the desires of Hitler to have more "living space." The difficult part comes with the timing. Hitler felt that England and France would back down again, concerning Poland, just as they had when Hitler had violated the Versailles Treaty in ... 1. Moving German soldiers into the Rhineland. 2. Uniting Austria with Germany. 3. Expanding into the Sudetenland, followed -- not long after -- by taking over ALL of Czechoslovakia (despite his promise to respect the soverenty of that nation.)Hitler was sure that he could prevent England and France out of the war in 1939. Why? Because he knew they expected the Soviet Union to come into the war if Hitler invaded Poland. Germany would be caught in a "Two Front War" and would quickly be defeated. Hitler did the impossible - He made a deal with the Soviet Union to be friends for the next 10 years. With Russia out of the way France and England would be alone facing the German defensive line, the "Siegfried Line." They could not invade Germany, they could not save Poland, so why go to war.Hitler was sure he could take Poland without a war starting. This would give Germany more time to build a larger Navy.As you know England and France DID declare war, Hitler lost his gamble and World War II began.One must say, concerning this, that it is one man's opinion.AnswerDear Martina, Most historians in Europe refer to the period 1914-1945 as "the second 30 year war" of Europe. The point being that the period "between the wars" was just a temporary armistice.With such a view on history, war was so to speak already in effect, there needed only come a breach of armistice. The armistice was kept stable by balance of power. Once this balance was lost, breach of armistice and major war was inevitable.When Russia/Soviet Union joined the Central camp (i.e. Germany/Austria) in the period between the wars, balance of power shifted massively against the West (France, UK). They no longer stood a chance. Appeasement was born, but could only delay the inevitable.AnswerWORLD WAR 2 WAS INEVITABLE! I think ww2 was inevitable because: The Germans hated the treaty of versatile because they were forced to repay all of the damage inflict to the allies in World War 1 and they were already practically broke because of the war. They also were only allowed to have 100,000 men in the German army and were not allowed to have a army or a navy and this was a big thing to the Germans because they took great pride in there defensive force.They also lost a lot of land to other countries which they were not very happy with and they were also forced to get rid of there royal family and replace it with a democracy. also because the French invade Germany because they were not paying there reparation and the German people hated this so they started riots against the French so the French stared to slowly move out of Germany.But one of the main reasons was that Hitler became the prime minister of Germany he was a solider in ww1 who believed that Germany could of won ww1 if they did not sign the treaty of vertallie he called them the November terrorist. Hitler hated the allies and was strongly against paying the allies the reparations he also want to return Germany back to its former glory and the German people loved the idea of that. He also loved war and wanted to claim back all of the land German lost in the treaty. he also hated to see the German people suffer so much.

What is soverenty?

Add your answer:

What is popular soverenty?