answersLogoWhite

0

Simple meaning is - how many people are directly reporting to one manager.

Span of management also known as span of control means how many subordinates are handled by a superior. It is one of the basic functions of organization.

Simple meaning of Span of Management is how many people are directly reporting to one manager.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Management

Different types of span of management?

Two types of Span of management/control are there:Wider span of management and Narrow span of management. Wider span of control results in a flat organization and narrow span of control results in tall organization structure.http://www.mbaknol.com/management-principles/span-of-management-types/


What is span of control in management?

Span of control refers to the reach of management. A supervisor who has 14 employees has a span of control that encompasses those 14 employees.


Are span of management and unity of command similar?

1. Describe how unity of commander is affected by span of management and visa-versa.


What are the factors influencing span of control of management?

The actual level of the management is a factor that influences the span of control of management. Other factors include the type of work involved, and the degree of centralization within the company.


What is span of management discuss factors affecting the span of management?

Also known as span of control, is a very important concept of organizing function of management. It refers to the number of subordinates that can be handled effectively by a superior in an organization. It signifies how the relations are planned between superior and subordinates in an organization. Span of management is generally categorized under two heads- Narrow span and Wide span. Narrow Span of management means a single manager or supervisor oversees few subordinates. This gives rise to a tall organizational structure. While, a wide span of management means a single manager or supervisor oversees a large number of subordinates. This gives rise to a flat organizational structure.There is an inverse relation between the span of management and the number of hierarchical levels in an organization, i.e., narrow the span of management , greater the number of levels in an organization. Narrow span of management is more costly compared to wide span of management as there are larger number of superiors/ managers and thus there is greater communication issues too between various management levels. The less geographically scattered the subordinates are, the better it is to have a wide span of management as it would be feasible for managers to be in touch with the subordinates and to explain them how to efficiently perform the tasks. In case of narrow span of management, there are comparatively more growth opportunities for a subordinate as the number of levels is more. The more efficient and organized the managers are in performing their tasks, the better it is to have wide span of management for such organization. The less capable, motivated and confident the employees are, the better it is to have a narrow span of management so that the managers can spend time with them and supervise them well. The more standardized is the nature of tasks ,i.e., if same task can be performed using same inputs, the better it is to have a wide span of management as more number of subordinates can be supervised by a single superior. There is more flexibility, quick decision making, effective communication between top level and low level management,and improved customer interaction in case of wide span of management. Technological advancement such as mobile phones, mails, etc. makes it feasible for superiors to widen their span of management as there is more effective communication. An optimal/ideal span of control according to the modern authors is fifteen to twenty subordinates per manager, while according to the traditional authors the ideal number is six subordinates per manager. But actually, an ideal span of control depends upon the nature of an organization, skills and capabilities of manager, the employees skills and abilities, the nature of job, the degree of interaction required between superior and subordinates.

Related Questions

Different types of span of management?

Two types of Span of management/control are there:Wider span of management and Narrow span of management. Wider span of control results in a flat organization and narrow span of control results in tall organization structure.http://www.mbaknol.com/management-principles/span-of-management-types/


What is span of control in management?

Span of control refers to the reach of management. A supervisor who has 14 employees has a span of control that encompasses those 14 employees.


What is narrow span of management?

Narrow span of management means a single manager or supervisor oversees few subordinates.


Are span of management and unity of command similar?

1. Describe how unity of commander is affected by span of management and visa-versa.


What Span of Management?

Simple meaning is - how many people are directly reporting to one manager. Span of management also known as span of control means how many subordinates are handled by a superior. It is one of the basic functions of organization. Simple meaning of Span of Management is how many people are directly reporting to one manager.


What are the factors influencing span of control of management?

The actual level of the management is a factor that influences the span of control of management. Other factors include the type of work involved, and the degree of centralization within the company.


Definition of span of manaement?

The span of management refers to the number of subordinates or employees that a manager can effectively supervise and control. It is the range of responsibility that a manager can handle efficiently while maintaining effective communication and decision-making processes within an organization. A wider span of management typically indicates a flatter organizational structure with fewer management layers.


What is span of management discuss factors affecting the span of management?

Also known as span of control, is a very important concept of organizing function of management. It refers to the number of subordinates that can be handled effectively by a superior in an organization. It signifies how the relations are planned between superior and subordinates in an organization. Span of management is generally categorized under two heads- Narrow span and Wide span. Narrow Span of management means a single manager or supervisor oversees few subordinates. This gives rise to a tall organizational structure. While, a wide span of management means a single manager or supervisor oversees a large number of subordinates. This gives rise to a flat organizational structure.There is an inverse relation between the span of management and the number of hierarchical levels in an organization, i.e., narrow the span of management , greater the number of levels in an organization. Narrow span of management is more costly compared to wide span of management as there are larger number of superiors/ managers and thus there is greater communication issues too between various management levels. The less geographically scattered the subordinates are, the better it is to have a wide span of management as it would be feasible for managers to be in touch with the subordinates and to explain them how to efficiently perform the tasks. In case of narrow span of management, there are comparatively more growth opportunities for a subordinate as the number of levels is more. The more efficient and organized the managers are in performing their tasks, the better it is to have wide span of management for such organization. The less capable, motivated and confident the employees are, the better it is to have a narrow span of management so that the managers can spend time with them and supervise them well. The more standardized is the nature of tasks ,i.e., if same task can be performed using same inputs, the better it is to have a wide span of management as more number of subordinates can be supervised by a single superior. There is more flexibility, quick decision making, effective communication between top level and low level management,and improved customer interaction in case of wide span of management. Technological advancement such as mobile phones, mails, etc. makes it feasible for superiors to widen their span of management as there is more effective communication. An optimal/ideal span of control according to the modern authors is fifteen to twenty subordinates per manager, while according to the traditional authors the ideal number is six subordinates per manager. But actually, an ideal span of control depends upon the nature of an organization, skills and capabilities of manager, the employees skills and abilities, the nature of job, the degree of interaction required between superior and subordinates.


What are the advantages and disadvantages of narrow span of control?

Also known as span of control, is a very important concept of organizing function of management. It refers to the number of subordinates that can be handled effectively by a superior in an organization. It signifies how the relations are planned between superior and subordinates in an organization. Span of management is generally categorized under two heads- Narrow span and Wide span. Narrow Span of management means a single manager or supervisor oversees few subordinates. This gives rise to a tall organizational structure. While, a wide span of management means a single manager or supervisor oversees a large number of subordinates. This gives rise to a flat organizational structure.There is an inverse relation between the span of management and the number of hierarchical levels in an organization, i.e., narrow the span of management , greater the number of levels in an organization. Narrow span of management is more costly compared to wide span of management as there are larger number of superiors/ managers and thus there is greater communication issues too between various management levels. The less geographically scattered the subordinates are, the better it is to have a wide span of management as it would be feasible for managers to be in touch with the subordinates and to explain them how to efficiently perform the tasks. In case of narrow span of management, there are comparatively more growth opportunities for a subordinate as the number of levels is more. The more efficient and organized the managers are in performing their tasks, the better it is to have wide span of management for such organization. The less capable, motivated and confident the employees are, the better it is to have a narrow span of management so that the managers can spend time with them and supervise them well. The more standardized is the nature of tasks ,i.e., if same task can be performed using same inputs, the better it is to have a wide span of management as more number of subordinates can be supervised by a single superior. There is more flexibility, quick decision making, effective communication between top level and low level management,and improved customer interaction in case of wide span of management. Technological advancement such as mobile phones, mails, etc. makes it feasible for superiors to widen their span of management as there is more effective communication. An optimal/ideal span of control according to the modern authors is fifteen to twenty subordinates per manager, while according to the traditional authors the ideal number is six subordinates per manager. But actually, an ideal span of control depends upon the nature of an organization, skills and capabilities of manager, the employees skills and abilities, the nature of job, the degree of interaction required between superior and subordinates


Discuss Graicunas theory of span of management?

check this article :- http://kalyan-city.blogspot.com/2011/08/graicunas-theory-of-span-of-control.html


What kind of risks did you take during the time span of this evaluation?

management skills


What kind of risk did you take during the time span of this evaluation?

management skills

Trending Questions
What RM process step requires a cycle of continuous reassessment until the benefits of completing the mission outweigh the risks of not completing? What factors should be considered when determining the scope of a research project, and how can the keyword research for the project be effectively conducted? What are the key benefits and best practices for implementing agile big room planning in a project team? How does environment affects managers? What is definition of a mission statement? What is the management for diverticular perforation? What are the contribution of Henri frayol to management? What are some effective strategic team building activities that can enhance collaboration and communication among team members? What is an example of conflict management? What is the McDonald's management structure? What are organisational targets? Are project managers needed for the upcoming initiative? What is the difference between a risk and an issue in project management? How can the organisation plan to avoid resource shortfalls and surpluses? What does it mean when a company is underutilizing its resources? What are the areas of knowledge in the PMBOK? What are the key differences between a technical product owner and a product owner, and how do their roles and responsibilities vary within a software development team? What are the companies or firms that applies Deming's 14 points? What is the second step in the activation process? What does the fgi in shepell-fgi mean?