What is narrow span of management?

Different types of span of management?

Two types of Span of management/control are there:Wider span of management and Narrow span of management. Wider span of control results in a flat organization and narrow span of control results in tall organization structure.http://www.mbaknol.com/management-principles/span-of-management-types/

What are the advantages and disadvantages of narrow span of control?

Also known as span of control, is a very important concept of organizing function of management. It refers to the number of subordinates that can be handled effectively by a superior in an organization. It signifies how the relations are planned between superior and subordinates in an organization. Span of management is generally categorized under two heads- Narrow span and Wide span. Narrow Span of management means a single manager or supervisor oversees few subordinates. This gives rise to a tall organizational structure. While, a wide span of management means a single manager or supervisor oversees a large number of subordinates. This gives rise to a flat organizational structure.There is an inverse relation between the span of management and the number of hierarchical levels in an organization, i.e., narrow the span of management , greater the number of levels in an organization. Narrow span of management is more costly compared to wide span of management as there are larger number of superiors/ managers and thus there is greater communication issues too between various management levels. The less geographically scattered the subordinates are, the better it is to have a wide span of management as it would be feasible for managers to be in touch with the subordinates and to explain them how to efficiently perform the tasks. In case of narrow span of management, there are comparatively more growth opportunities for a subordinate as the number of levels is more. The more efficient and organized the managers are in performing their tasks, the better it is to have wide span of management for such organization. The less capable, motivated and confident the employees are, the better it is to have a narrow span of management so that the managers can spend time with them and supervise them well. The more standardized is the nature of tasks ,i.e., if same task can be performed using same inputs, the better it is to have a wide span of management as more number of subordinates can be supervised by a single superior. There is more flexibility, quick decision making, effective communication between top level and low level management,and improved customer interaction in case of wide span of management. Technological advancement such as mobile phones, mails, etc. makes it feasible for superiors to widen their span of management as there is more effective communication. An optimal/ideal span of control according to the modern authors is fifteen to twenty subordinates per manager, while according to the traditional authors the ideal number is six subordinates per manager. But actually, an ideal span of control depends upon the nature of an organization, skills and capabilities of manager, the employees skills and abilities, the nature of job, the degree of interaction required between superior and subordinates

What is span of management discuss factors affecting the span of management?

Also known as span of control, is a very important concept of organizing function of management. It refers to the number of subordinates that can be handled effectively by a superior in an organization. It signifies how the relations are planned between superior and subordinates in an organization. Span of management is generally categorized under two heads- Narrow span and Wide span. Narrow Span of management means a single manager or supervisor oversees few subordinates. This gives rise to a tall organizational structure. While, a wide span of management means a single manager or supervisor oversees a large number of subordinates. This gives rise to a flat organizational structure.There is an inverse relation between the span of management and the number of hierarchical levels in an organization, i.e., narrow the span of management , greater the number of levels in an organization. Narrow span of management is more costly compared to wide span of management as there are larger number of superiors/ managers and thus there is greater communication issues too between various management levels. The less geographically scattered the subordinates are, the better it is to have a wide span of management as it would be feasible for managers to be in touch with the subordinates and to explain them how to efficiently perform the tasks. In case of narrow span of management, there are comparatively more growth opportunities for a subordinate as the number of levels is more. The more efficient and organized the managers are in performing their tasks, the better it is to have wide span of management for such organization. The less capable, motivated and confident the employees are, the better it is to have a narrow span of management so that the managers can spend time with them and supervise them well. The more standardized is the nature of tasks ,i.e., if same task can be performed using same inputs, the better it is to have a wide span of management as more number of subordinates can be supervised by a single superior. There is more flexibility, quick decision making, effective communication between top level and low level management,and improved customer interaction in case of wide span of management. Technological advancement such as mobile phones, mails, etc. makes it feasible for superiors to widen their span of management as there is more effective communication. An optimal/ideal span of control according to the modern authors is fifteen to twenty subordinates per manager, while according to the traditional authors the ideal number is six subordinates per manager. But actually, an ideal span of control depends upon the nature of an organization, skills and capabilities of manager, the employees skills and abilities, the nature of job, the degree of interaction required between superior and subordinates.

Which is more efficient a wide or narrow span of control?

narrow span of control is more efficient

What is the definition of a Narrow span of control?

. Narrow span is thd number of people who report to many manegar

What is tall organization?

A tall organization is one which, in relation to its size, has a large number of levels of management hierarchy. This implies a narrow span of control .

The disadvantages and advantage of narrow span of control?

One disadvantage of a narrow span of control is the fact that everyone will come to you to make decisions. A narrow span of control is advantageous because you will be informed of everything going on in the business.

Identify the span of control of the marketing manager?

Narrow and wide

What is the span of control in ryanair?

Narrow.

What are some reasons for having a narrow span of control in an organization?

In brief, - More control by top management - More chances for advancement - Greater Specialization - Closer Supervision

What are the disadvantages of narrow Span-of-control?

A narrow span-of-control increases organizational levels making it hard for top level management to keep in touch with issues at the operational level. Apart from this, it also increases the number of employees in a company, thus increasing the costs. Finally, issues of coordination are rampant between different units and managers.

What are disadvantages of narrow span of control?

time consuming

What is narrow span of management?

Add your answer:

What were some features of the new big businesses?

Discuss the functional area of management?

What is the differences between personal management vs hrm?

What factor of production directs the other three?

What is the difference between economics and management?