narrow span of control is more efficient
One disadvantage of a narrow span of control is the fact that everyone will come to you to make decisions. A narrow span of control is advantageous because you will be informed of everything going on in the business.
Narrow.
. Narrow span is thd number of people who report to many manegar
Two types of Span of management/control are there:Wider span of management and Narrow span of management. Wider span of control results in a flat organization and narrow span of control results in tall organization structure.http://www.mbaknol.com/management-principles/span-of-management-types/
Narrow span of control refers to a management structure where a supervisor oversees a small number of employees, allowing for closer supervision and more direct communication. In contrast, a wide span of control involves a manager overseeing a larger number of employees, which can lead to greater autonomy for workers and potentially more efficient decision-making. The choice between the two often depends on the complexity of tasks, the skills of the workforce, and the organizational culture. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages regarding oversight, communication, and employee empowerment.
One disadvantage of a narrow span of control is the fact that everyone will come to you to make decisions. A narrow span of control is advantageous because you will be informed of everything going on in the business.
Narrow.
. Narrow span is thd number of people who report to many manegar
Narrow and wide
Two types of Span of management/control are there:Wider span of management and Narrow span of management. Wider span of control results in a flat organization and narrow span of control results in tall organization structure.http://www.mbaknol.com/management-principles/span-of-management-types/
Narrow span of control refers to a management structure where a supervisor oversees a small number of employees, allowing for closer supervision and more direct communication. In contrast, a wide span of control involves a manager overseeing a larger number of employees, which can lead to greater autonomy for workers and potentially more efficient decision-making. The choice between the two often depends on the complexity of tasks, the skills of the workforce, and the organizational culture. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages regarding oversight, communication, and employee empowerment.
Easy to communication
time consuming
One disadvantage to the narrow span of control is the fact that it may take the leader a while to make a decision, which slows the organization.
A narrow span of control is where a manager directly line manages a small number of subordinates. The narrower the span of control, the more effective the manager can be. This is because their time will not be totally devoted to dealing with issues, problems and performance. Instead, more time can be spent manging the business, building an overview of how the business is performing and developing strategic plans and longer term aims.
In brief, - More control by top management - More chances for advancement - Greater Specialization - Closer Supervision
more supervision over subordinates, so better quality of goods and services producred