The gaseous emissions of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and other undesirables depending on the grade of the coal.
It is burned in coal-fired power plants to supply energy.
There are more coal plants than solar plants because the cost per Mega-Watt is much less using coal than solar power, and currently coal is more efficient. The problem today is that in a environmentally conscious society coal is a 'dirty' fuel, and solar power is clean. That is why environmentalists are pushing for more Solar (and wind) power generation.
fear of the waste.
Coal Power plants are cheaper to build.
Coal Power plants are cheaper to build.
Coal is thenatural resource that enables the operation of most of China's power plants.
You don't list the waste problems, so how can I answer? However radioactive waste is not a problem for a coal burning plant
Nuclear power plants produce radioactive waste, which remains hazardous for thousands of years, unlike the waste produced by coal-burning power plants. Coal plants generate larger quantities of more immediate pollutants like sulfur dioxide, mercury, and particulate matter, which can have significant health and environmental impacts.
They both generate electricity.
Coal and nuclear power plants are both used to generate electricity, but they differ in terms of energy source and environmental impact. Coal power plants burn coal to produce heat, while nuclear power plants use nuclear reactions to generate heat. Nuclear power plants produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions compared to coal plants, but they create radioactive waste that needs to be carefully stored. Coal power plants are cheaper to build and operate, but they contribute to air pollution and climate change.
Coal
The first power plants were installed by Edison in the 1880's, and were powered by coal, so that's the answer