0
What is the argument from contingency that Aquinas borrowed from Avicenna?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What in your own words was Thomas Aquinas' argument for the existence of god?
here be me thomas aquinas own argument to say that god is real i can prove bye the holy spirit
Who made the teleological argument?
The teleological argument is often attributed to the ancient Greek philosopher Plato and later developed by the philosopher William Paley in his book "Natural Theology" published in 1802.
What is aquina's design argument?
Aquinas's design argument is a philosophical argument that asserts the existence of God based on observations of the order and purpose evident in the natural world. According to Aquinas, the complexity and harmony in nature suggest a design by an intelligent creator, which he identifies as God. The argument is also known as the teleological argument, derived from the Greek word "telos," meaning purpose or end.
Who was one of the main proponents of the cosmological argument?
Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas. For additional supporters of this argument, check the corresponding Wikipedia article.
Thomas Aquinas was influenced by what philosopher?
Thomas Aquinas was influenced by the philosopher Aristotle, incorporating many of his ideas into his own theology and philosophy. Aquinas sought to reconcile Aristotelian philosophy with Christian theology, believing that reason and faith could complement each other.
What is Thomas Aquinas' first cause argument?
Thomas Aquinas's believed that there had to be a God because he thought that everything had a cause and the cause for the Universe is God. God had to be the first cause.
Contradiction to St Thomas Aquinas five ways?
One common contradiction to St. Thomas Aquinas' five ways is the argument of the Problem of Evil. This argument asserts that the existence of evil and suffering in the world is inconsistent with the idea of an all-powerful, all-loving God. The Problem of Evil raises questions about the nature of God's attributes and challenges the logic of Aquinas' proofs for the existence of God.
What distinction does Hick draw on to defend Thomas Aquinas' first-cause argument?
Between a regress of events and a regress of explanations
Who made cosmological argument?
The cosmological argument has been explored by various philosophers and theologians throughout history, but it is often associated with the work of Thomas Aquinas, a medieval Christian philosopher. Aquinas formulated his version of the argument in his "Five Ways" in his influential work "Summa Theologica."
Where are St Thomas' five proofs of the existence of God?
St Thomas Aquinas relied on what is known as the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God. He claimed that there were five valid ways to prove God exists, although thre of them are essentially restatements of the same things. Essentially his view was that some contingent beings exist; contingent beings require a noncontingent ground of being (a "necessary thing") in order to exist; therefore a noncontingent ground of being exists. This is not a great deal different to the Ontological Argument. Aquinas' theological positions involved making unprovable assumptions from which to prove the unprovable.
How did Thomas Aquinas attempt to explain the differences between Aristotle and the Church's teachings?
Thomas Aquinas sought to reconcile Aristotle's philosophy with the teachings of the Church by integrating reason and faith. He believed that reason could lead to an understanding of God's truths, and that philosophical principles could complement theological doctrines. Aquinas argued that where Aristotle's teachings conflicted with Christian doctrine, it was due to Aristotle's limitations in understanding divine mysteries rather than any inherent contradiction between reason and faith.
What does aquinas say about the ontological argument?
Aquinas critiques the ontological argument, stating that it is not possible to deduce the existence of God from the concept of a perfect being alone. He argues that we cannot know God's existence simply through reason or definition, but must rely on faith and revelation.
