Sending them to nearby relatives that you trust.
No. As parents you already have custody but a judge can not give you a guarantee that no matter what will you keep that. The best of the child comes first and if you for some reason is found unfit down the road the child would need a new guardian. If you are divorced and granted custody that court order is valid unless the other parent (or the state) get custody for whatever reason (if both parents become unfit etc). And custody lasts until the child is 18. You can not get a guarantee from the judge that you as a parent will have custody until the child is 18. There are 2 parents and according to the law both are allowed to seek custody of their child.
Yes, if the parents do not "keep" their child with them that implies they leave the child with someone else. That someone else could petition the court for a legal guardianship and gain legal custody of the child. That would be in the best interest of the child and the person with whom the child lives should have legal custody.Yes, if the parents do not "keep" their child with them that implies they leave the child with someone else. That someone else could petition the court for a legal guardianship and gain legal custody of the child. That would be in the best interest of the child and the person with whom the child lives should have legal custody.Yes, if the parents do not "keep" their child with them that implies they leave the child with someone else. That someone else could petition the court for a legal guardianship and gain legal custody of the child. That would be in the best interest of the child and the person with whom the child lives should have legal custody.Yes, if the parents do not "keep" their child with them that implies they leave the child with someone else. That someone else could petition the court for a legal guardianship and gain legal custody of the child. That would be in the best interest of the child and the person with whom the child lives should have legal custody.
If the parents have never married and live separately with their own parents, a court would need to decide on custody. Typically, the court will place the child with the mother, but the best interests of the child are primary.
No. If the parents cannot make an agreement regarding custody on their own the court will make a determination that is in the best interest of the child. The parent without physical custody will be given a visitation schedule that must be followed by both parents.No. If the parents cannot make an agreement regarding custody on their own the court will make a determination that is in the best interest of the child. The parent without physical custody will be given a visitation schedule that must be followed by both parents.No. If the parents cannot make an agreement regarding custody on their own the court will make a determination that is in the best interest of the child. The parent without physical custody will be given a visitation schedule that must be followed by both parents.No. If the parents cannot make an agreement regarding custody on their own the court will make a determination that is in the best interest of the child. The parent without physical custody will be given a visitation schedule that must be followed by both parents.
The judge makes a ruling on the best interest of the child, but this is why Bird Nest Custody should be ordered. see link below
No! There must be good reason and proof before either parent of a child can take total custody if the courts had already given shared custody between the parents of that child. It's best to seek legal advice to be sure you maintain the custody of your child. Good luck Marcy
Technically in cases where there is no order of custody possesion is 9/10ths of the law IF both parents are legally recognized to be parents (i.e. have signed the birth certificate). However if one parent has had primary physical custody of the child following a separation and has been responsible for the majority of the care for the child the court may not look kindly on the other parent hijacking custody. The best thing to do is file for temporary custody before actually keeping the child.
Only if the court determines it would be in the best interests of the child to award such custody. The biological parents and/or an immediate relative of either would be considered before a person with no legal or biological ties to the child.
If the parents agree with the arrangement then that is possible. However, for the child's safety and best interest the grandparents should have the legal authority to arrange medical treatment and address school issues. You should consult with an attorney or other legal advocate.
Yes he can , as it is in the best interest of the child anyway.
Not necessarily. Child custody is not a race. Generally, the court's main concern is in the best interest of the child.Not necessarily. Child custody is not a race. Generally, the court's main concern is in the best interest of the child.Not necessarily. Child custody is not a race. Generally, the court's main concern is in the best interest of the child.Not necessarily. Child custody is not a race. Generally, the court's main concern is in the best interest of the child.
And you are? If the parents were not married the mother has custody until the father can petition for it after he has proved paternity in court. If married you have equal custody. Just living with you does not give you custody. it has to go through court.