Want this question answered?
'Where they would be protected from the wind' is an adverbial clause, a group of words that contains a subject (they) and a verb (be protected) but is not a complete thought, not a complete sentence.An adverbial clause is a dependent clause that functions as an adverb; the entire clause modifies a verb, an adjective, or another adverb.
"That". In a non-restrictive adjective clause, such as in the sentence: "He went to the Eiffel Tower, which is located in Paris." The non-restrictive adjective clause, "which is located in Paris", called non-restrictive because it does not serve to improve the identification of the Eiffel Tower or "restrict" the meaning of it, contains the adjective clause pronoun "which". The reader would know what the Eiffel Tower was referring to even without the adjective clause because there is only one Eiffel Tower. This is what makes the adjective clause non-restrictive - not improving the identification of the noun. One could not use "that" in place of "which" because "that" is only used to alter or restrict the meaning of the noun. Here is an example of a restrictive adjective clause using "that": "I went to the store that is on the corner of Sunset and Vine." In this sentence the adjective clause, "that is on the corner of Sunset and Vine", restricts which store we are referring to, to the one "that is on the corner of Sunset and Vine" and not the one on Main and Third Streets. Thus it is called a restrictive clause. In restrictive clauses, one can use "that" and any of the other adjective clause pronouns: who, whom, which, where, when.
The complete predicate would be 'would like' because it is the complete verb clause.
The word "who" would not introduce an adverb clause; it typically introduces a noun clause instead.
You would have the adjective clause under the subject. The independent clause could be the verb and the thing describing the verb would be under it.
No, neither word is an adjective. Always is an adverb and stops is a verb.The words could be part of a subordinate clause, but it would almost certainly be adverbial.
A clause that has a subject and a verb but does not express a complete thought is a dependent clause, also called a subordinate clause.Since traditionally a complete independent sentence is said to "express a complete thought", an example of a clause which cannot stand alone as a complete sentence would be one such type. An independent sentence in English must have a tensed verb, so I guess we are looking for a clause whose verb is not tensed. An infinitival clause with "to" would be one such example. In "It would be too difficult for us to clean all these fish", for instance, "for us to clean all these fish" is a clause with subject "us" and verb "clean", but there is no past or present tensed form of a verb, so it cannot stand alone as a complete sentence.Other similar examples use an "-ing" form of a verb, rather than the "to" infinitive form.
"with a sigh" is a prepositional phrase because it includes a preposition ("with") and a noun ("sigh"), but it does not have a subject and verb to form a complete thought like a clause would.
The clause "before Jane leaves" is a dependent clause, which means it relies on an independent clause, or main clause, to complete the sentence's meaning.Answer:'Before Jane leaves home,..' on its own is a dependent clause, or what is also known as a hanging clause waiting for the main clause to make it complete.'Before Jane leaves home' is also an introductory adverbial clause as it has a subject 'I' and a verb 'leaves' which make it a clause, then it has the prepositional word 'before' telling when Janes leaves home. This; therefore, introduces the adverbial clause.Before Jane leaves home, she clears the table.'She clears the table.' ( main clause that can stand on its own as a dependant sentence)'Before she leaves home,...' is dependent on 'she clears the table.' to make it complete.
Asubordinate(or dependent) clause dose not express a complete thought and cannot stand by itself as a complete sentence.Example: If wishes were horsesThe meaning of a subordinate clause is complete only when the clause is attached to an independent clause.Example: If wishes were horses, then beggars would ride.Sometimes the word that begins the subordinate clause is the subject of the clause.Example: This is a line that comes from a mother goose rhyme.Example: When my grandmother was young, many children were learning mother goose rhymes.Example: This is the trophy that out soccer team won.
The lack of punctuation puzzled me for a time, but I would say so, since 'French' is describing 'word'.
Yes, 'where they would be protected from the wind' is a noun clause, a group of words that has a subject (they) and a verb (be protected) but is not a complete thought, and functions in a sentence as a noun.Example: This is where they would be protected from the wind. (direct object of the verb)It is also a relative clause with the word 'where' functioning as a relative pronoun, relating back to an antecedent.Example: This is a place where they would be protected from the wind. (the relative clause 'relates' to the antecedent 'place')