North was against slavery, and south wanted more slavery. south wanted more slavery so they could work on the cotton fields. if more people work on cotton fields the south would have more money.
North :)
The Civil War was really all about slavery. The South wanted slavery to continue, and generally the North wanted slavery to end. However, from the South's point of view the Civil War was all about states rights versus federal government rights. The South wanted the states to have more rights and therefore more power than the federal government. The North generally wanted the federal government to have more rights and therefore more power than the states.
About 22 million to 9 million, north with the most
The South was dominated by the cotton trade, which depended on slave-labour. It was a rural and feudal society, where they discouraged their sons from soiling their hands in industry and commerce. This kept it from moving forward in line with other countries. The North was increasingly industrialised, and employers simply could not use massed ranks of unskilled labour, so slavery didn't fit the system.
1.economic and social differences between the north and south 2. states rights vs. federal rights 3.fight between pro-slavery and abolition 4.growth of the abolition movement 5.the election of 1980-Abraham Lincoln
The body of water the union (North)controlledfor keepingKentuckywas the Ohio River.By the way, this is happening in thebeginningof the Civil War (North vs. South) (NON SLAVERY VS. SLAVERY)
The south treated their slaves much more fairly than the deep southern states. (South example: North Carolina) (Deep South example: Georgia, South Carolina) Maryland treated their slave fairly, and they were considered a northern state.
There was this tension, because the territories claimed by the South became slave territories and the territories claimed by the North became free territories. The North wanted no slavery and the South wanted slaves. So, the North and south raced to get as much land as possible to cause the other direction ( N. or S. ) to submit into slavery or no slavery
As in the American Civil War? Slavery and Federal vs States rights (i.e the role of government)
Grant vs Lee (North & South)
North :)
North VN vs South VN.
The reliance on cotton production and slavery in the South led to economic prosperity due to the profitability of cotton, but it also entrenched the region's dependence on slave labor. Socially, it created a hierarchical society based on race and entrenched racial inequalities. Morally, it led to widespread acceptance of the dehumanization of enslaved individuals and perpetuated the idea of white supremacy.
The Civil War was really all about slavery. The South wanted slavery to continue, and generally the North wanted slavery to end. However, from the South's point of view the Civil War was all about states rights versus federal government rights. The South wanted the states to have more rights and therefore more power than the federal government. The North generally wanted the federal government to have more rights and therefore more power than the states.
Industry vs. agriculture: (N vs. S)
Primarily Ho Chi Minh (North) vs Diem then later Ky (South).
Yes, a man vs. fate conflict is an external conflict. The only internal conflict there is is a man vs. self conflict. Other external conflicts include man vs. man, man vs. society, and man vs. nature.