Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.
Modern 300 presumably.
There is no modern equivalent of the Roman centurion. There were eleven grades of centurion which roughly corresponded to modern military ranks ranging from sergeant to major.There is no modern equivalent of the Roman centurion. There were eleven grades of centurion which roughly corresponded to modern military ranks ranging from sergeant to major.There is no modern equivalent of the Roman centurion. There were eleven grades of centurion which roughly corresponded to modern military ranks ranging from sergeant to major.There is no modern equivalent of the Roman centurion. There were eleven grades of centurion which roughly corresponded to modern military ranks ranging from sergeant to major.There is no modern equivalent of the Roman centurion. There were eleven grades of centurion which roughly corresponded to modern military ranks ranging from sergeant to major.There is no modern equivalent of the Roman centurion. There were eleven grades of centurion which roughly corresponded to modern military ranks ranging from sergeant to major.There is no modern equivalent of the Roman centurion. There were eleven grades of centurion which roughly corresponded to modern military ranks ranging from sergeant to major.There is no modern equivalent of the Roman centurion. There were eleven grades of centurion which roughly corresponded to modern military ranks ranging from sergeant to major.There is no modern equivalent of the Roman centurion. There were eleven grades of centurion which roughly corresponded to modern military ranks ranging from sergeant to major.
It didn't, as there weren't any "modern bicycles" in the 1700s.
Mustafa Kemal Attaturk is considered the father of modern Turkey.
It is positive. --- Actually, it can go either way in modern usage, though it has a better connotation than "stingy."
It is a neutral connotation.
Negative connotation
It is a negative connotation.
uneasy is negative connotation
A general connotation for infinity is forever, but because connotation is dependent on the individual reader, the connotation varies.
Connotation, it combines an adjective with a positive connotation with a verb that has negative connotation.
Negative connotation
No it is a positive connotation.
"Protruding" has a negative connotation; it connotes excess.
The word "sniggering" is a form of "snickering" and may have the synonyms chuckling, giggling, or tittering. Snickering does have a modern connotation of evil or mischief.
A guardian or protector. This was the original definition of "custodian" before the modern janitorial connotation.