A constitutional monarchy is the foundation of Canada's executive government. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth is the head of State for Canada. However, as Canada is a constitutionalmonarchy, most of the Queen's powers are exercised by the Governor General only on the advice of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada (as per s. 11 and 12 of the Constitution Act, 1867).
By constitutional convention, the right to advise the monarch rests solely with those privy councillors who are also currently ministers (as they are accountable, both collectively and as individuals, to the elected House of Commons). The use of the Queen's powers on the advice of privy councillors is referred to as the Queen-in-Council (or the Governor General-in-Council, as appropriate), and forms the executive branch of Canadian government.
The underlying assumption of this question, which is that constitutional monarchies are considered democracies by dint of being constitutional monarchies, is false. "Constitutional Monarchy" simply means that the power of the monarch (king) is limited by a constitution. This constitution can be enforced by some kind of oligarchy, aristocracy, or the common gentry. If the constitution is enforced by an oligarchy or aristocracy, the resulting state is not a democracy, whereas if it is enforced by the common gentry, it is democratic.Now, since almost all current constitutional monarchies are of this latter variety (monarchies with a constitution enforced by common people), people generally drop the intermediate step of separating non-democratic constitutional monarchies from democratic constitutional monarchies and refer to constitutional monarchies as a form of democracy.
Why are you asking dozens and dozens of questions about constitutional monarchies? And why ask a stupid question like this one? France and US both kicked their monarchies out and then wrote a constitution. There has not been a constitutional monarch in either country.
There are different types of governments in Europe. Some are monarchies, constitutional monarchies, and republics.
France and England?
Jamaica
i don't know the way that they are alike, but the absolute the ruler can legally do whatever he/she wants, but as the constitutional, the ruler is bound by the constitution and it's laws.
The similarities between a monarchy and constitutional monarchy are that their are both monarchies.
Constitutional monarchies
There is nothing bad about a Monarchy provided that it is a Constitutional Monarchy, ie, the country is run by democratically elected people and not the reigning monarch. All European monarchies are Constitutional Monarchies.
A [constitutional] monarchy can be both a unitary and a federal form of government. There are contemporary [federal] constitutional monarchies in some countries (Malaysia, Bhutan, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom), and unitary constitutional monarchies in others (Australia, Belize, Belgium, Solomon Islands). It is more of a technicality whether or not you can classify certain monarchies as unitary or federal in the modern day governmental system.
They are similar because they both have a head of the government.
They are similar because they both have a head of the government.