There is no contraction. Just is an adverb that idiomatically means "just now" or in the case of the past tense had, "just then." Just is not included in the contraction.
Contractions using pronouns can use "had" and be followed by just and a verb.
I'd just finished the laundry = I had just finished
It'd just started raining = It had just started
The answer is "isn't to." The first word in the analogy (won't) is a contraction of "will not", just like "isn't" is a contraction of "is not."
No, who're is just a contraction for who are.
No, who're is just a contraction for who are.
for de and le it's du, but for de and la, there is no contraction, it's just de la.
No. "He'll" is a contraction for He will. If you just had "He" then it could be a subject.
There is no contraction for were you. There is no contraction for you were.There is a contraction for "you are" (you're).
"Where'd" can be a contraction of either "where did" or "where would": Now, where'd I put it? I just had it five minutes ago. Where'd you like to go for dinner?
NO because braxton hicks is just a temporary contraction, not increasing in frequency and interval.
The contraction for does not is doesn't.
There is no contraction for "its not."There is a contraction for "it is" (it's).There is a contraction for "is not" (isn't).
The word is spelled will, just as you spelled it.
they just do ok god