0
What is the correct chronological order of these events Emancipation Proclamation Three-Fifths Compromise Missouri Compromise Compromise of 1850 Missouri Compromise Compromise of 1850 Three-Fifths Com?
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which is the correct chronological order of these events French Indian War molasses act Revolutionary War declaration of independence?
Three-Fifths Compromise, Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850, Emancipation Proclamation A+
What would be a good compromise?
A good compromise for the Proclamation of 1763 that can satisfy the King and the colonists is to make a better proclamation and/or trade to get bigger lands, like barter trading.
Is it true that the compromise of 1850 eliminted slavery only in the south?
No, it just made it harder to create new slave-states anywhere. You may be thinking of the Emancipation Proclamation, issued in mid-war, which outlawed slavery in the rebel states, but allowed it to continue in the four states of the Upper South that had remained loyal.
Is it true slavery was prohibited in the south by The Missouri Compromise?
No, It only was prohibited to any new states that would enter the union from that date forward. MO could not have slaves. Maryland was entered the union as a "free" state. No states that would later come into the union that initially territory within the Louisanna Purchase could not have slaves.
What compromise dealt with the slavery?
The slave trade compromise was an agreement during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, protecting the interests of slaveholders, that forbid Congress the power to act on the slave trade for twenty years. This meant that slaves would be mostly a state power.
What is the correct chronological order of these eventsCompromise of 1850, Three-Fifths Compromise, Missouri Compromise,Emancipation Proclamation?
Three-Fifths Compromise, Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850, Emancipation Proclamation
What is the correct order for the chronological order?
Three-Fifths Compromise Missouri Compromise ,Compromise of 1850,Emancipation Proclamation
Which is the correct chronological order of these events French Indian War molasses act Revolutionary War declaration of independence?
Three-Fifths Compromise, Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850, Emancipation Proclamation A+
What did the threefifths compromise do?
allowed the slave states to count a slave as three-fifths of a person
How was emancipation proclamation a compromise with the south?
It wasn't a compromise, It was a law stating that all slaves in designated states and parts of staes were free.
What was the conflict and compromise of the emancipation proclamation?
The Conflict is that the Border States were not included. The compromise was that when the North finished the Civil War it would be a simple matter to declare all of the US as slave free.
Slavery had been abolished in this area as a result of which legislation?
Slavery was abolished in this area as a result of the Emancipation Proclamation issued by President Abraham Lincoln in 1863.
What would be a good compromise?
A good compromise for the Proclamation of 1763 that can satisfy the King and the colonists is to make a better proclamation and/or trade to get bigger lands, like barter trading.
Which of these temporarily settled the slavery issue?
The Emancipation Proclamation issued by President Lincoln in 1863 and the passage of the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1865 formally ended slavery in the United States, settling the issue temporarily.
The ThreeFifths Compromise determined how population would be counted for?
The Three-Fifths Compromise determined how population would be counted for....? Representation in Congress and also direct taxes on the population of the states.
What is the correct chronological order for these events?
Use of DATES or TIMES (In 2009, At 8 a.m.)Then, And thenNext day, Next week, Next Month, Next yearFirst, second, third
Is it true that the compromise of 1850 eliminted slavery only in the south?
No, it just made it harder to create new slave-states anywhere. You may be thinking of the Emancipation Proclamation, issued in mid-war, which outlawed slavery in the rebel states, but allowed it to continue in the four states of the Upper South that had remained loyal.
