Want this question answered?
Cost and consequences of providing the subsidies and welfare in South Africa
Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.
Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.
The primary advantage of farm subsidies is for the farmer to make a profit. Without subsidies farmers would loose money because the prices paid for farm products is too low.Subsidies help the supply of food to be abundant therefore lowering the cost of food for the general public.
Pros: - Subsidies would allow for farmers to compete with low-priced foreign imports - Subsidies would keep the cost of goods down - Subsidies would help farmers maintain a steady income, helping to protect them from variations in year-to-year income. (Such as a bad growing year. Some years, there are fewer crops that are produced, be it due to poor weather or other factors, and these loss of crops would dramatically harm a farmer's income. Subsidies would help make up this difference. Cons: -It costs a fortune (remember, we are in $14 trillion in debt) -Subsidies tend to go to larger farmers, who would not be threatened as much by a bad growing year. -subsidies would go against the free market
Cost and consequences of providing the subsidies and welfare in South Africa
Cost and consequences of providing the subsidies and welfare in South Africa
Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.
Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.
Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.
Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.
Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.
Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.
Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.
Instead of having people die now, you push off the inevitable to the future. After all, people have to die someday. Maybe fewer people will be on welfare in the future? That's the short argument.
Advantages of welfare programs that are controlled by each individual states is providing much needed food, medical care and money for citizens that qualify and it can also redistribute wealth across the population. Disadvantages is the cost to the local governments that provides welfare programs and it is also an opportunity for fraud.
to compensate an externality if it is an external cost then taxes will be imposed if it is an external benefit then subsidies will be imposed.