VIII-X-MMI
Improved Answer:-
VIII-IX-MMI because September is the 9th month of the year
IX/XXX/MMI
The date January 8, 2001, is written as VIII.I.MMCI in Roman numerals.
The date September 2, 1996, in Roman numerals is written as "II.IX.MCMXCVI."
IX.XVII.MCMLXXXIII
The date 9/11/2001 would be written as "IX/XI/MMI" in Roman numerals.
IX/XXX/MMI
The date January 8, 2001, is written as VIII.I.MMCI in Roman numerals.
The date September 2, 1996, in Roman numerals is written as "II.IX.MCMXCVI."
IX.XVII.MCMLXXXIII
The date 9/11/2001 would be written as "IX/XI/MMI" in Roman numerals.
The date September 23rd 2009 can also be written as 09-23-2009 and this can be represented by the Roman numerals IX.XXIII.MMIX
VIII-IX-MMI
As you asked this question on 15th September 2009, which can also be written as 15-09-2009, this date in Roman numerals would be XV.IX.MMIX
XIV-XII-MMI
The conventional conversion of 11th September 1998 into Roman numerals is XI-September-MCMXCVIII whether or not the Romans themselves enumerated it in this way is questionable.
The date September 30, 2003 in Roman numerals is written as IX-XXX-MMIII.
Today's conventional conversion of 20th September 2009 into Roman numerals is XX-September-MMIX.However, there is strong evidence to support the fact that the Romans themselves would have written the above date as XX-September-MMVIIII.