Religion and science, at least in the absolute sense(where it is assumed that having religious believes is a form of non-education) are incompatible. Religion offers certainty where none exists, science finds new ways to prove itself wrong.
The conflict between science and religion in 19th century was about the creation accounts.
There's nothing special about opposing points of view. There are debates between science and science, and debates between religion and religion as well. For as long we don't know all the absolute truths, and possibly even after that, people will disagree.
There are many books that delve into the relationship between science and religion; however, many of these books have a bias towards science or a bias towards religion. Some books that delve into the relationship between science and religion are "Science and Christianity: Conflict or Coherence?" by Henry F. Schaefer III and "Rock of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life" by Stephen Jay Gould.
there isn't a connection between sience and religion but with hindis there is a prediction with the moons and stars
The distinction between science and religion lies in their methods of seeking knowledge and understanding. Science relies on empirical evidence, experimentation, and observation to explain the natural world, while religion is based on faith, belief in the supernatural, and spiritual teachings.
the inability of science and religion to blend
Frank M. Turner has written: 'Between science and religion' -- subject(s): Religion and science, England, History
Science is known while religion is unknown.Science is physically proven while reliogion is mentally proven. Thus science is in the past while religion is in the future. However, both science and religion does not raise the standard of human evolution and the middle path between these two extremes is 'spiritual'. A spiritual journey travel inwards while science and religion delve on outwardly matters.
Religion is not a science.
There is no relationship, and it is not proper to give religion an air of respectibility by mentioning it in the same breath as science. Religion is against science because science proves religious belief is a laughing-stock. Religion has inhibited progress in science, and will, by nature, always try to do so. Compare a prayer to a jab of penicillin. Science is questions that may never be answered; religion is answers that may never be questioned. I'd like to know how we got here then......In your opinion.
Religion is a very complicated subject, since there are many different religions, and each religion is subject to many different interpretations. Science is much more unified. I would say that there are at least some interpretations of religion which are compatible with science. There are also interpretations of religion which are incompatible with science. The choice is yours.
R. C. Wallace has written: 'Science and religion' -- subject(s): Religion and science 'Religion, science and the modern world' -- subject(s): Religion and science