Ate is a past tense verb while eaten is not
'I have ate' is not grammatically correct, so 'I have eaten' would be correct
Eating is just to hog soemthng witout actually enjoying the taste of it..and obviously the opposite is the meaning of taste...
The difference is under the rules of English grammar, "I have eaten" (the past participle form of the word "eat") makes sense, while "I have ate" (the simple past tense form of the word "eat) does not. "I ate" does make sense, however, and it has the same meaning as "I have eaten".
I is at the beginning of a sentence, and me is somewhere else in the sentence. Ex. I ate an apple. An apple was eaten by me.
HAVE eaten is correct where as HAD eaten is not.
he has played means he played that game someday earlier...means not just now... and he played me he just played it..... for example.... i have eaten this.......it means that either u r saying that u have eaten this or u have eaten this earlier and next u would tell about its taste....etc.... i ate this......this means that there was something kept there and u just ate it... Hope i helped....:)
you have already eaten
Eating is the present participle; eaten is the past participle.
Eaten is the past participle of eat, not the past tense. Ate is the past tense.
i have eaten
The past participle of "ate" is "eaten."
ate or has eaten.
She got eaten by the leeches because she ate a banana. The leeches smelled the banana, and therefore ate her.
The past tense refers to the verb form used to indicate a completed action in the past (e.g. "walked"). The past participle is a verb form used to form verb tenses such as the present perfect and past perfect (e.g. "eaten") or as an adjective in passive voice constructions (e.g. "broken glass").